Integrative Leadership and Cross-Sector Reforms

High School Career Academy Implementation in an Urban District

Joel R. Malin, Donald Hackmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzed leadership structures, processes, and practices that have enabled and constrained an ambitious career and college readiness reform within an urban school district. It was designed to discern how leaders worked across cross-sector boundaries to support district-wide high school career academy implementation. Research Method: Case study methodology was applied to examine a long-standing cross-sector collaborative partnership that supports the district’s career academy reforms. Data were collected over 15 months through interviews, observations, and document analysis. Crosby and Bryson’s integrative leadership theoretical framework guided data collection and analyses. Findings: The integrative leadership framework was suitable for understanding the boundary-spanning leadership work that was occurring, involving school leaders, civic officials, and business members in leadership roles to support academy reforms. As expected, for example, system turbulence was key to the reform’s initiation, establishing legitimacy was arduous and important, and numerous facilitative structures were developed. Some nuances were also apparent. For instance, we noted the motivating power of the shared goal to enhance the relevance of student educational experiences, while business and civic leaders were particularly interested in developing student employment skills. We also noted formidable political opposition and the development of a new, cross-sector power structure. Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice: Current educational theory is inadequate to explain leadership practices and provide guidance as school leaders increasingly enter into cross-sector collaborations. Scholars should seek to address this issue by prioritizing this line of research. Practitioners can benefit from insights gained by applying the integrated leadership framework to cross-sector initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEducational Administration Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

school career
academy
district
leadership
reform
leader
career
school
educational theory
document analysis
research policy
research practice
research method
legitimacy
opposition
student
methodology
interview

Keywords

  • career readiness
  • college readiness
  • cross-sector collaboration
  • educational leadership
  • educational reform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Integrative Leadership and Cross-Sector Reforms : High School Career Academy Implementation in an Urban District. / Malin, Joel R.; Hackmann, Donald.

In: Educational Administration Quarterly, 01.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b41fb6ccdc344685a6af828d42e4ef32,
title = "Integrative Leadership and Cross-Sector Reforms: High School Career Academy Implementation in an Urban District",
abstract = "Purpose: This study analyzed leadership structures, processes, and practices that have enabled and constrained an ambitious career and college readiness reform within an urban school district. It was designed to discern how leaders worked across cross-sector boundaries to support district-wide high school career academy implementation. Research Method: Case study methodology was applied to examine a long-standing cross-sector collaborative partnership that supports the district’s career academy reforms. Data were collected over 15 months through interviews, observations, and document analysis. Crosby and Bryson’s integrative leadership theoretical framework guided data collection and analyses. Findings: The integrative leadership framework was suitable for understanding the boundary-spanning leadership work that was occurring, involving school leaders, civic officials, and business members in leadership roles to support academy reforms. As expected, for example, system turbulence was key to the reform’s initiation, establishing legitimacy was arduous and important, and numerous facilitative structures were developed. Some nuances were also apparent. For instance, we noted the motivating power of the shared goal to enhance the relevance of student educational experiences, while business and civic leaders were particularly interested in developing student employment skills. We also noted formidable political opposition and the development of a new, cross-sector power structure. Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice: Current educational theory is inadequate to explain leadership practices and provide guidance as school leaders increasingly enter into cross-sector collaborations. Scholars should seek to address this issue by prioritizing this line of research. Practitioners can benefit from insights gained by applying the integrated leadership framework to cross-sector initiatives.",
keywords = "career readiness, college readiness, cross-sector collaboration, educational leadership, educational reform",
author = "Malin, {Joel R.} and Donald Hackmann",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0013161X18785870",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Educational Administration Quarterly",
issn = "0013-161X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrative Leadership and Cross-Sector Reforms

T2 - High School Career Academy Implementation in an Urban District

AU - Malin, Joel R.

AU - Hackmann, Donald

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Purpose: This study analyzed leadership structures, processes, and practices that have enabled and constrained an ambitious career and college readiness reform within an urban school district. It was designed to discern how leaders worked across cross-sector boundaries to support district-wide high school career academy implementation. Research Method: Case study methodology was applied to examine a long-standing cross-sector collaborative partnership that supports the district’s career academy reforms. Data were collected over 15 months through interviews, observations, and document analysis. Crosby and Bryson’s integrative leadership theoretical framework guided data collection and analyses. Findings: The integrative leadership framework was suitable for understanding the boundary-spanning leadership work that was occurring, involving school leaders, civic officials, and business members in leadership roles to support academy reforms. As expected, for example, system turbulence was key to the reform’s initiation, establishing legitimacy was arduous and important, and numerous facilitative structures were developed. Some nuances were also apparent. For instance, we noted the motivating power of the shared goal to enhance the relevance of student educational experiences, while business and civic leaders were particularly interested in developing student employment skills. We also noted formidable political opposition and the development of a new, cross-sector power structure. Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice: Current educational theory is inadequate to explain leadership practices and provide guidance as school leaders increasingly enter into cross-sector collaborations. Scholars should seek to address this issue by prioritizing this line of research. Practitioners can benefit from insights gained by applying the integrated leadership framework to cross-sector initiatives.

AB - Purpose: This study analyzed leadership structures, processes, and practices that have enabled and constrained an ambitious career and college readiness reform within an urban school district. It was designed to discern how leaders worked across cross-sector boundaries to support district-wide high school career academy implementation. Research Method: Case study methodology was applied to examine a long-standing cross-sector collaborative partnership that supports the district’s career academy reforms. Data were collected over 15 months through interviews, observations, and document analysis. Crosby and Bryson’s integrative leadership theoretical framework guided data collection and analyses. Findings: The integrative leadership framework was suitable for understanding the boundary-spanning leadership work that was occurring, involving school leaders, civic officials, and business members in leadership roles to support academy reforms. As expected, for example, system turbulence was key to the reform’s initiation, establishing legitimacy was arduous and important, and numerous facilitative structures were developed. Some nuances were also apparent. For instance, we noted the motivating power of the shared goal to enhance the relevance of student educational experiences, while business and civic leaders were particularly interested in developing student employment skills. We also noted formidable political opposition and the development of a new, cross-sector power structure. Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice: Current educational theory is inadequate to explain leadership practices and provide guidance as school leaders increasingly enter into cross-sector collaborations. Scholars should seek to address this issue by prioritizing this line of research. Practitioners can benefit from insights gained by applying the integrated leadership framework to cross-sector initiatives.

KW - career readiness

KW - college readiness

KW - cross-sector collaboration

KW - educational leadership

KW - educational reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049671275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049671275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0013161X18785870

DO - 10.1177/0013161X18785870

M3 - Article

JO - Educational Administration Quarterly

JF - Educational Administration Quarterly

SN - 0013-161X

ER -