TY - JOUR
T1 - Integration of plant and microbial oil processing at oilcane biorefineries for more sustainable biofuel production
AU - Cortés-Peña, Yoel R.
AU - Woodruff, William
AU - Banerjee, Shivali
AU - Li, Yalin
AU - Singh, Vijay
AU - Rao, Christopher V.
AU - Guest, Jeremy S.
N1 - The authors thank Dr. Fredy Altpeter, from the Feedstocks Theme at the Center of Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovations (CABBI), for sharing his expertise on oilcane. Y.C.-P. was partially supported by the Support for Under-Represented Groups in Engineering (SURGE) program at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE\u20141746047. This work was funded by the DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program under Award Number DE-SC0018420). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Energy.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Oilcane—an oil-accumulating crop engineered from sugarcane—and microbial oil have the potential to improve renewable oil production and help meet the expected demand for bioderived oleochemicals and fuels. To assess the potential synergies of processing both plant and microbial oils, the economic and environmental implications of integrating microbial oil production at oilcane and sugarcane biorefineries were characterized. Due to decreased crop yields that lead to higher simulated feedstock prices and lower biorefinery capacities, current oilcane prototypes result in higher costs and carbon intensities than microbial oil from sugarcane. To inform oilcane feedstock development, we calculated the required biomass yields (as a function of oil content) for oilcane to achieve financial parity with sugarcane. At 10 dw% oil, oilcane can sustain up to 30% less yield than sugarcane and still be more profitable in all simulated scenarios. Assuming continued improvements in microbial oil production from cane juice, achieving this target results in a minimum biodiesel selling price of 1.34 [0.90, 1.85] USD∙L−1 (presented as median [5th, 95th] percentiles), a carbon intensity of 0.51 [0.47, 0.55] kg CO2e L−1, and a total biodiesel yield of 2140 [1870, 2410] L ha−1 year−1. Compared to biofuel production from soybean, this outcome is equivalent to 3.0–3.9 as much biofuel per hectare of land and a 57%–63% reduction in carbon intensity. While only 20% of simulated scenarios fell within the market price range of biodiesel (0.45–1.11 USD∙L−1), if the oilcane biomass yield would improve to 25.6 DMT∙ha−1∙y−1 (an equivalent yield to sugarcane) 87% of evaluated scenarios would have a minimum biodiesel selling price within or below the market price range.
AB - Oilcane—an oil-accumulating crop engineered from sugarcane—and microbial oil have the potential to improve renewable oil production and help meet the expected demand for bioderived oleochemicals and fuels. To assess the potential synergies of processing both plant and microbial oils, the economic and environmental implications of integrating microbial oil production at oilcane and sugarcane biorefineries were characterized. Due to decreased crop yields that lead to higher simulated feedstock prices and lower biorefinery capacities, current oilcane prototypes result in higher costs and carbon intensities than microbial oil from sugarcane. To inform oilcane feedstock development, we calculated the required biomass yields (as a function of oil content) for oilcane to achieve financial parity with sugarcane. At 10 dw% oil, oilcane can sustain up to 30% less yield than sugarcane and still be more profitable in all simulated scenarios. Assuming continued improvements in microbial oil production from cane juice, achieving this target results in a minimum biodiesel selling price of 1.34 [0.90, 1.85] USD∙L−1 (presented as median [5th, 95th] percentiles), a carbon intensity of 0.51 [0.47, 0.55] kg CO2e L−1, and a total biodiesel yield of 2140 [1870, 2410] L ha−1 year−1. Compared to biofuel production from soybean, this outcome is equivalent to 3.0–3.9 as much biofuel per hectare of land and a 57%–63% reduction in carbon intensity. While only 20% of simulated scenarios fell within the market price range of biodiesel (0.45–1.11 USD∙L−1), if the oilcane biomass yield would improve to 25.6 DMT∙ha−1∙y−1 (an equivalent yield to sugarcane) 87% of evaluated scenarios would have a minimum biodiesel selling price within or below the market price range.
KW - bioproducts
KW - BioSTEAM
KW - greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
KW - integrated biorefinery
KW - life cycle assessment (LCA)
KW - renewable identification number (RIN)
KW - techno-economic analysis (TEA)
KW - triacylglyceride (TAG)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207556797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85207556797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.13183
DO - 10.1111/gcbb.13183
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85207556797
SN - 1757-1693
VL - 16
JO - GCB Bioenergy
JF - GCB Bioenergy
IS - 11
M1 - e13183
ER -