Instructional discourse and argumentative writing

Joshua A. Morris, Brian W. Miller, Richard C Anderson, Kim Thi Nguyen-Jahiel, Tzu Jung Lin, Theresa Scott, Jie Zhang, Jingjing Sun, Shufeng Ma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Fifth-grade students from two urban school districts completed an integrated unit on wolves. Classes received either direct instruction (DI) or collaborative group work (CG). Analysis of reasoning in classroom talk indicated that CG students more often used connective and contrastive words and the performative verb phrases I think and I know than DI students. Analysis of written arguments about a controversial question raised by the unit indicated that, compared to DI students, CG students included more logical connectives, contrastives, and performative verbs, produced fewer unelaborated arguments, more frequently asked rhetorical questions, and more often considered both sides of the policy issue. The study provides fresh insight into how instructional frameworks can affect how students view themselves as writers in relation to a prospective audience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Educational Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

discourse
group work
student
instruction
writer
district
classroom
school

Keywords

  • Audience
  • Classroom discourse
  • Connectives
  • Written argumentation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Morris, J. A., Miller, B. W., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K. T., Lin, T. J., Scott, T., ... Ma, S. (Accepted/In press). Instructional discourse and argumentative writing. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.001

Instructional discourse and argumentative writing. / Morris, Joshua A.; Miller, Brian W.; Anderson, Richard C; Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim Thi; Lin, Tzu Jung; Scott, Theresa; Zhang, Jie; Sun, Jingjing; Ma, Shufeng.

In: International Journal of Educational Research, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morris, Joshua A. ; Miller, Brian W. ; Anderson, Richard C ; Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim Thi ; Lin, Tzu Jung ; Scott, Theresa ; Zhang, Jie ; Sun, Jingjing ; Ma, Shufeng. / Instructional discourse and argumentative writing. In: International Journal of Educational Research. 2018.
@article{04441aeb2d6a472196612ad10eb49dde,
title = "Instructional discourse and argumentative writing",
abstract = "Fifth-grade students from two urban school districts completed an integrated unit on wolves. Classes received either direct instruction (DI) or collaborative group work (CG). Analysis of reasoning in classroom talk indicated that CG students more often used connective and contrastive words and the performative verb phrases I think and I know than DI students. Analysis of written arguments about a controversial question raised by the unit indicated that, compared to DI students, CG students included more logical connectives, contrastives, and performative verbs, produced fewer unelaborated arguments, more frequently asked rhetorical questions, and more often considered both sides of the policy issue. The study provides fresh insight into how instructional frameworks can affect how students view themselves as writers in relation to a prospective audience.",
keywords = "Audience, Classroom discourse, Connectives, Written argumentation",
author = "Morris, {Joshua A.} and Miller, {Brian W.} and Anderson, {Richard C} and Nguyen-Jahiel, {Kim Thi} and Lin, {Tzu Jung} and Theresa Scott and Jie Zhang and Jingjing Sun and Shufeng Ma",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.001",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0883-0355",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Instructional discourse and argumentative writing

AU - Morris, Joshua A.

AU - Miller, Brian W.

AU - Anderson, Richard C

AU - Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim Thi

AU - Lin, Tzu Jung

AU - Scott, Theresa

AU - Zhang, Jie

AU - Sun, Jingjing

AU - Ma, Shufeng

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Fifth-grade students from two urban school districts completed an integrated unit on wolves. Classes received either direct instruction (DI) or collaborative group work (CG). Analysis of reasoning in classroom talk indicated that CG students more often used connective and contrastive words and the performative verb phrases I think and I know than DI students. Analysis of written arguments about a controversial question raised by the unit indicated that, compared to DI students, CG students included more logical connectives, contrastives, and performative verbs, produced fewer unelaborated arguments, more frequently asked rhetorical questions, and more often considered both sides of the policy issue. The study provides fresh insight into how instructional frameworks can affect how students view themselves as writers in relation to a prospective audience.

AB - Fifth-grade students from two urban school districts completed an integrated unit on wolves. Classes received either direct instruction (DI) or collaborative group work (CG). Analysis of reasoning in classroom talk indicated that CG students more often used connective and contrastive words and the performative verb phrases I think and I know than DI students. Analysis of written arguments about a controversial question raised by the unit indicated that, compared to DI students, CG students included more logical connectives, contrastives, and performative verbs, produced fewer unelaborated arguments, more frequently asked rhetorical questions, and more often considered both sides of the policy issue. The study provides fresh insight into how instructional frameworks can affect how students view themselves as writers in relation to a prospective audience.

KW - Audience

KW - Classroom discourse

KW - Connectives

KW - Written argumentation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046754326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046754326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046754326

JO - International Journal of Educational Research

JF - International Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0883-0355

ER -