Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link?

Ernest I. Pascarella, Ty Cruce, Paul D. Umbach, Gregory C. Wolniak, George D Kuh, Robert M. Carini, John C. Hayek, Robert M. Gonyea, Chun Mei Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Academic selectivity plays a dominant role in the public's understanding of what constitutes institutional excellence or quality in undergraduate education. In this study, we analyzed two independent data sets to estimate the net effect of three measures of college selectivity on dimensions of documented good practices in undergraduate education. With statistical controls in place for important confounding influences, an institution's median student SAT/ACT score, a nearly identical proxy for that score, and the Barron's Selectivity Score explained from less than 0.1% to 20% of the between-institution variance and from less than 0.1 % to 2.7% of the total variance in good practices. The implications of these findings for what constitutes quality in undergraduate education, college choice decisions, and the validity of national college rankings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-285
Number of pages35
JournalJournal of Higher Education
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

Fingerprint

best practice
education
ranking
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Pascarella, E. I., Cruce, T., Umbach, P. D., Wolniak, G. C., Kuh, G. D., Carini, R. M., ... Zhao, C. M. (2006). Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link? Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 251-285. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0016

Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education : How strong is the link? / Pascarella, Ernest I.; Cruce, Ty; Umbach, Paul D.; Wolniak, Gregory C.; Kuh, George D; Carini, Robert M.; Hayek, John C.; Gonyea, Robert M.; Zhao, Chun Mei.

In: Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 77, No. 2, 01.03.2006, p. 251-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Pascarella, EI, Cruce, T, Umbach, PD, Wolniak, GC, Kuh, GD, Carini, RM, Hayek, JC, Gonyea, RM & Zhao, CM 2006, 'Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link?', Journal of Higher Education, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 251-285. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0016
Pascarella, Ernest I. ; Cruce, Ty ; Umbach, Paul D. ; Wolniak, Gregory C. ; Kuh, George D ; Carini, Robert M. ; Hayek, John C. ; Gonyea, Robert M. ; Zhao, Chun Mei. / Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education : How strong is the link?. In: Journal of Higher Education. 2006 ; Vol. 77, No. 2. pp. 251-285.
@article{7cbf8f8bb80843eea49f9f17a6626449,
title = "Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link?",
abstract = "Academic selectivity plays a dominant role in the public's understanding of what constitutes institutional excellence or quality in undergraduate education. In this study, we analyzed two independent data sets to estimate the net effect of three measures of college selectivity on dimensions of documented good practices in undergraduate education. With statistical controls in place for important confounding influences, an institution's median student SAT/ACT score, a nearly identical proxy for that score, and the Barron's Selectivity Score explained from less than 0.1{\%} to 20{\%} of the between-institution variance and from less than 0.1 {\%} to 2.7{\%} of the total variance in good practices. The implications of these findings for what constitutes quality in undergraduate education, college choice decisions, and the validity of national college rankings are discussed.",
author = "Pascarella, {Ernest I.} and Ty Cruce and Umbach, {Paul D.} and Wolniak, {Gregory C.} and Kuh, {George D} and Carini, {Robert M.} and Hayek, {John C.} and Gonyea, {Robert M.} and Zhao, {Chun Mei}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/jhe.2006.0016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "251--285",
journal = "Journal of Higher Education",
issn = "0022-1546",
publisher = "Ohio State University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education

T2 - How strong is the link?

AU - Pascarella, Ernest I.

AU - Cruce, Ty

AU - Umbach, Paul D.

AU - Wolniak, Gregory C.

AU - Kuh, George D

AU - Carini, Robert M.

AU - Hayek, John C.

AU - Gonyea, Robert M.

AU - Zhao, Chun Mei

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - Academic selectivity plays a dominant role in the public's understanding of what constitutes institutional excellence or quality in undergraduate education. In this study, we analyzed two independent data sets to estimate the net effect of three measures of college selectivity on dimensions of documented good practices in undergraduate education. With statistical controls in place for important confounding influences, an institution's median student SAT/ACT score, a nearly identical proxy for that score, and the Barron's Selectivity Score explained from less than 0.1% to 20% of the between-institution variance and from less than 0.1 % to 2.7% of the total variance in good practices. The implications of these findings for what constitutes quality in undergraduate education, college choice decisions, and the validity of national college rankings are discussed.

AB - Academic selectivity plays a dominant role in the public's understanding of what constitutes institutional excellence or quality in undergraduate education. In this study, we analyzed two independent data sets to estimate the net effect of three measures of college selectivity on dimensions of documented good practices in undergraduate education. With statistical controls in place for important confounding influences, an institution's median student SAT/ACT score, a nearly identical proxy for that score, and the Barron's Selectivity Score explained from less than 0.1% to 20% of the between-institution variance and from less than 0.1 % to 2.7% of the total variance in good practices. The implications of these findings for what constitutes quality in undergraduate education, college choice decisions, and the validity of national college rankings are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645754707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645754707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/jhe.2006.0016

DO - 10.1353/jhe.2006.0016

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33645754707

VL - 77

SP - 251

EP - 285

JO - Journal of Higher Education

JF - Journal of Higher Education

SN - 0022-1546

IS - 2

ER -