Insight into the structure of compound words among speakers of Chinese and English

Zhang Jie, Richard C. Anderson, Wang Qiuying, Jerome Packard, Wu Xinchun, Tang Shan, Ke Xiaoling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Knowledge of compound word structures in Chinese and English was investigated, comparing 435 Chinese and 258 Americans, including second, fourth, and sixth graders, and college undergraduates. As anticipated, the results revealed that Chinese speakers performed better on a word structure analogy task than their English-speaking counterparts. Also, as anticipated, speakers of both languages performed better on noun + noun and verb + particle compounds, which are more productive in their respective languages than noun + verb and verb + noun compounds, which are less productive. Both Chinese and English speakers performed significantly better on novel compounds than on familiar compounds, most likely because familiar compounds are lexicalized and do not invite decomposition into constituents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)753-779
Number of pages27
JournalApplied Psycholinguistics
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Language
language
speaking
Compound Words
Nouns
Verbs
Word Structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Insight into the structure of compound words among speakers of Chinese and English. / Jie, Zhang; Anderson, Richard C.; Qiuying, Wang; Packard, Jerome; Xinchun, Wu; Shan, Tang; Xiaoling, Ke.

In: Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.10.2012, p. 753-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jie, Zhang ; Anderson, Richard C. ; Qiuying, Wang ; Packard, Jerome ; Xinchun, Wu ; Shan, Tang ; Xiaoling, Ke. / Insight into the structure of compound words among speakers of Chinese and English. In: Applied Psycholinguistics. 2012 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 753-779.
@article{6bc6181dc61546fd8f0b4a8e22a8dac5,
title = "Insight into the structure of compound words among speakers of Chinese and English",
abstract = "Knowledge of compound word structures in Chinese and English was investigated, comparing 435 Chinese and 258 Americans, including second, fourth, and sixth graders, and college undergraduates. As anticipated, the results revealed that Chinese speakers performed better on a word structure analogy task than their English-speaking counterparts. Also, as anticipated, speakers of both languages performed better on noun + noun and verb + particle compounds, which are more productive in their respective languages than noun + verb and verb + noun compounds, which are less productive. Both Chinese and English speakers performed significantly better on novel compounds than on familiar compounds, most likely because familiar compounds are lexicalized and do not invite decomposition into constituents.",
author = "Zhang Jie and Anderson, {Richard C.} and Wang Qiuying and Jerome Packard and Wu Xinchun and Tang Shan and Ke Xiaoling",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0142716411000555",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "753--779",
journal = "Applied Psycholinguistics",
issn = "0142-7164",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insight into the structure of compound words among speakers of Chinese and English

AU - Jie, Zhang

AU - Anderson, Richard C.

AU - Qiuying, Wang

AU - Packard, Jerome

AU - Xinchun, Wu

AU - Shan, Tang

AU - Xiaoling, Ke

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Knowledge of compound word structures in Chinese and English was investigated, comparing 435 Chinese and 258 Americans, including second, fourth, and sixth graders, and college undergraduates. As anticipated, the results revealed that Chinese speakers performed better on a word structure analogy task than their English-speaking counterparts. Also, as anticipated, speakers of both languages performed better on noun + noun and verb + particle compounds, which are more productive in their respective languages than noun + verb and verb + noun compounds, which are less productive. Both Chinese and English speakers performed significantly better on novel compounds than on familiar compounds, most likely because familiar compounds are lexicalized and do not invite decomposition into constituents.

AB - Knowledge of compound word structures in Chinese and English was investigated, comparing 435 Chinese and 258 Americans, including second, fourth, and sixth graders, and college undergraduates. As anticipated, the results revealed that Chinese speakers performed better on a word structure analogy task than their English-speaking counterparts. Also, as anticipated, speakers of both languages performed better on noun + noun and verb + particle compounds, which are more productive in their respective languages than noun + verb and verb + noun compounds, which are less productive. Both Chinese and English speakers performed significantly better on novel compounds than on familiar compounds, most likely because familiar compounds are lexicalized and do not invite decomposition into constituents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869415890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869415890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0142716411000555

DO - 10.1017/S0142716411000555

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84869415890

VL - 33

SP - 753

EP - 779

JO - Applied Psycholinguistics

JF - Applied Psycholinguistics

SN - 0142-7164

IS - 4

ER -