TY - JOUR
T1 - Initial plant size affects response to thinning in soybean
AU - Davis, Vince M.
AU - Mellendorf, Nathan E.
AU - Villamil, María B.
AU - Nafziger, Emerson D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 by the American Society of Agronomy, 5585 Guilford Road, Madison, WI 53711. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/1/13
Y1 - 2015/1/13
N2 - Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] can produce compensatory yield following plant stand reduction, but the e ect of plant size within a developmental stage on this ability is unknown. We seeded two cultivars at 15, 30, 45, and 60 plants m-2, and identi ed large and small plants within each density at V3 (third trifoliate), V6 (sixth trifoliate), R2 (full bloom), and R4 (full pod) developmental stages. Subplots were either thinned to a density of 5.3 plants m-2 or left at intact densities. The ability for large or small plants to produce compensatory growth and yield was evaluated by the differences between subsequent growth and yield produced in thinned vs. intact stands. We found small plants had equivalent harvest index to large plants across all plant densities and developmental stages, suggesting small plants were as The efficient as large plants for compensating seed yield relative to biomass when stands were not thinned. However, when stands were thinned, compensatory growth and yield were different between large and small plants. For example, across all plant densities thinned at V3, large and small plants produced 51 and 37 g plant-1, respectively, and compensatory yield contributed 30 and 24 g plant-1, respectively. us, small plants produced 80% as much compensatory yield as large plants when thinned at V3. However, by the same comparison, the contribution of small plants declined to 57% when thinning was delayed to R4 development, suggesting small plants lost more compensatory ability over time. We conclude initial soybean plant size impacts compensatory yield plant-1.
AB - Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] can produce compensatory yield following plant stand reduction, but the e ect of plant size within a developmental stage on this ability is unknown. We seeded two cultivars at 15, 30, 45, and 60 plants m-2, and identi ed large and small plants within each density at V3 (third trifoliate), V6 (sixth trifoliate), R2 (full bloom), and R4 (full pod) developmental stages. Subplots were either thinned to a density of 5.3 plants m-2 or left at intact densities. The ability for large or small plants to produce compensatory growth and yield was evaluated by the differences between subsequent growth and yield produced in thinned vs. intact stands. We found small plants had equivalent harvest index to large plants across all plant densities and developmental stages, suggesting small plants were as The efficient as large plants for compensating seed yield relative to biomass when stands were not thinned. However, when stands were thinned, compensatory growth and yield were different between large and small plants. For example, across all plant densities thinned at V3, large and small plants produced 51 and 37 g plant-1, respectively, and compensatory yield contributed 30 and 24 g plant-1, respectively. us, small plants produced 80% as much compensatory yield as large plants when thinned at V3. However, by the same comparison, the contribution of small plants declined to 57% when thinning was delayed to R4 development, suggesting small plants lost more compensatory ability over time. We conclude initial soybean plant size impacts compensatory yield plant-1.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921490399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921490399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2134/agronj13.0599
DO - 10.2134/agronj13.0599
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84921490399
SN - 0002-1962
VL - 107
SP - 158
EP - 166
JO - Journal of Production Agriculture
JF - Journal of Production Agriculture
IS - 1
ER -