Inhibitory control of emotional processing: Theoretical and empirical considerations

Morgan E. Bartholomew, Wendy Heller, Gregory A. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Although inhibitory control appears to support successful emotion regulation (ER; Joorman and Gotlib, 2010; McCabe et al., 2010), few emotion inhibition studies position themselves in the literature on ER, and even fewer ER studies reference the role of emotion inhibition. Perhaps contributing to this, the ER literature is frequently divided into implicit or “automatic” (which subsumes emotion inhibition) and explicit or “effortful” control (Braunstein et al., 2017; Gyurak et al., 2011). The present paper evaluates relationships among constructs of inhibitory control, emotion inhibition, and ER to assess neural evidence for and against distinctions between implicit and explicit ER. We argue that, whereas the distinction between implicit and explicit ER may appear organizationally or conceptually helpful, such categorical distinctions are not supported by available research and in fact contribute to imbalances in the research literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Psychophysiology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emotions
Research
Inhibition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Emotion inhibition
  • Emotion regulation
  • Inhibitory control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Inhibitory control of emotional processing : Theoretical and empirical considerations. / Bartholomew, Morgan E.; Heller, Wendy; Miller, Gregory A.

In: International Journal of Psychophysiology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{8397784ce2ff4cf89d1eb187a74b1a26,
title = "Inhibitory control of emotional processing: Theoretical and empirical considerations",
abstract = "Although inhibitory control appears to support successful emotion regulation (ER; Joorman and Gotlib, 2010; McCabe et al., 2010), few emotion inhibition studies position themselves in the literature on ER, and even fewer ER studies reference the role of emotion inhibition. Perhaps contributing to this, the ER literature is frequently divided into implicit or “automatic” (which subsumes emotion inhibition) and explicit or “effortful” control (Braunstein et al., 2017; Gyurak et al., 2011). The present paper evaluates relationships among constructs of inhibitory control, emotion inhibition, and ER to assess neural evidence for and against distinctions between implicit and explicit ER. We argue that, whereas the distinction between implicit and explicit ER may appear organizationally or conceptually helpful, such categorical distinctions are not supported by available research and in fact contribute to imbalances in the research literature.",
keywords = "Emotion inhibition, Emotion regulation, Inhibitory control",
author = "Bartholomew, {Morgan E.} and Wendy Heller and Miller, {Gregory A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.03.015",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Psychophysiology",
issn = "0167-8760",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibitory control of emotional processing

T2 - Theoretical and empirical considerations

AU - Bartholomew, Morgan E.

AU - Heller, Wendy

AU - Miller, Gregory A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Although inhibitory control appears to support successful emotion regulation (ER; Joorman and Gotlib, 2010; McCabe et al., 2010), few emotion inhibition studies position themselves in the literature on ER, and even fewer ER studies reference the role of emotion inhibition. Perhaps contributing to this, the ER literature is frequently divided into implicit or “automatic” (which subsumes emotion inhibition) and explicit or “effortful” control (Braunstein et al., 2017; Gyurak et al., 2011). The present paper evaluates relationships among constructs of inhibitory control, emotion inhibition, and ER to assess neural evidence for and against distinctions between implicit and explicit ER. We argue that, whereas the distinction between implicit and explicit ER may appear organizationally or conceptually helpful, such categorical distinctions are not supported by available research and in fact contribute to imbalances in the research literature.

AB - Although inhibitory control appears to support successful emotion regulation (ER; Joorman and Gotlib, 2010; McCabe et al., 2010), few emotion inhibition studies position themselves in the literature on ER, and even fewer ER studies reference the role of emotion inhibition. Perhaps contributing to this, the ER literature is frequently divided into implicit or “automatic” (which subsumes emotion inhibition) and explicit or “effortful” control (Braunstein et al., 2017; Gyurak et al., 2011). The present paper evaluates relationships among constructs of inhibitory control, emotion inhibition, and ER to assess neural evidence for and against distinctions between implicit and explicit ER. We argue that, whereas the distinction between implicit and explicit ER may appear organizationally or conceptually helpful, such categorical distinctions are not supported by available research and in fact contribute to imbalances in the research literature.

KW - Emotion inhibition

KW - Emotion regulation

KW - Inhibitory control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064594407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064594407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.03.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.03.015

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30936042

AN - SCOPUS:85064594407

JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology

JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology

SN - 0167-8760

ER -