Information, perspective, and judgments about the self in face and dignity cultures

Young Hoon Kim, Dov Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

People's judgments about their own moral status and well-being were made differently by those from a Dignity culture (Anglo-Americans) and by those from a Face culture (Asian Americans). Face culture participants were more influenced by information processed from a third-person (compared with first-person) perspective, with information about the self having a powerful effect only when seen through another's eyes. Thus, (a) Asian Americans felt the greatest need for moral cleansing when thinking about how others would judge their many (vs. few) transgressions, but this effect did not hold when others were not invoked, and (b) Asian Americans defined themselves as having a rich social network and worthwhile life when thinking about how others would evaluate their many (vs. few) friendships, but again, effects did not hold when others were not invoked. In contrast, Anglo-Americans responded to information about their transgressions or friendships, but effects were pronounced only when other people were not invoked.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)537-550
Number of pages14
JournalPersonality and social psychology bulletin
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

Asian Americans
Social Support
Thinking

Keywords

  • Asian Americans vs. Anglo-Americans
  • Cross-cultural
  • Face and dignity cultures
  • Judgments
  • Perspective
  • The self

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Information, perspective, and judgments about the self in face and dignity cultures. / Kim, Young Hoon; Cohen, Dov.

In: Personality and social psychology bulletin, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 537-550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0af8d4e0e5b543b7b9d5d44cff0fb6f0,
title = "Information, perspective, and judgments about the self in face and dignity cultures",
abstract = "People's judgments about their own moral status and well-being were made differently by those from a Dignity culture (Anglo-Americans) and by those from a Face culture (Asian Americans). Face culture participants were more influenced by information processed from a third-person (compared with first-person) perspective, with information about the self having a powerful effect only when seen through another's eyes. Thus, (a) Asian Americans felt the greatest need for moral cleansing when thinking about how others would judge their many (vs. few) transgressions, but this effect did not hold when others were not invoked, and (b) Asian Americans defined themselves as having a rich social network and worthwhile life when thinking about how others would evaluate their many (vs. few) friendships, but again, effects did not hold when others were not invoked. In contrast, Anglo-Americans responded to information about their transgressions or friendships, but effects were pronounced only when other people were not invoked.",
keywords = "Asian Americans vs. Anglo-Americans, Cross-cultural, Face and dignity cultures, Judgments, Perspective, The self",
author = "Kim, {Young Hoon} and Dov Cohen",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167210362398",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "537--550",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Information, perspective, and judgments about the self in face and dignity cultures

AU - Kim, Young Hoon

AU - Cohen, Dov

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - People's judgments about their own moral status and well-being were made differently by those from a Dignity culture (Anglo-Americans) and by those from a Face culture (Asian Americans). Face culture participants were more influenced by information processed from a third-person (compared with first-person) perspective, with information about the self having a powerful effect only when seen through another's eyes. Thus, (a) Asian Americans felt the greatest need for moral cleansing when thinking about how others would judge their many (vs. few) transgressions, but this effect did not hold when others were not invoked, and (b) Asian Americans defined themselves as having a rich social network and worthwhile life when thinking about how others would evaluate their many (vs. few) friendships, but again, effects did not hold when others were not invoked. In contrast, Anglo-Americans responded to information about their transgressions or friendships, but effects were pronounced only when other people were not invoked.

AB - People's judgments about their own moral status and well-being were made differently by those from a Dignity culture (Anglo-Americans) and by those from a Face culture (Asian Americans). Face culture participants were more influenced by information processed from a third-person (compared with first-person) perspective, with information about the self having a powerful effect only when seen through another's eyes. Thus, (a) Asian Americans felt the greatest need for moral cleansing when thinking about how others would judge their many (vs. few) transgressions, but this effect did not hold when others were not invoked, and (b) Asian Americans defined themselves as having a rich social network and worthwhile life when thinking about how others would evaluate their many (vs. few) friendships, but again, effects did not hold when others were not invoked. In contrast, Anglo-Americans responded to information about their transgressions or friendships, but effects were pronounced only when other people were not invoked.

KW - Asian Americans vs. Anglo-Americans

KW - Cross-cultural

KW - Face and dignity cultures

KW - Judgments

KW - Perspective

KW - The self

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950328303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950328303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167210362398

DO - 10.1177/0146167210362398

M3 - Article

C2 - 20363907

AN - SCOPUS:77950328303

VL - 36

SP - 537

EP - 550

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 4

ER -