Abstract
Information manipulation theory (IMT) applies Grice's (1975; 1989) conversational maxims to the design of deceptive messages, but ignores the role of implicatures in deception. As a result, IMT proposes a dubious editing model of deception and an implausible conception of what it is that makes a deceptive message misleading. An alternative model, based on Grice's theory of implicature, proposes that deception involves the manipulation of information so as to generate false implicatures. McCornack's (1992; McCornack et al., 1992) studies are replicated with the inclusion of explicit checks to determine the covertness of the purported deceptive messages and to check manipulation of information-type (Quantity, Quality, Relevance, and Manner violations). None of the results are consistent with IMT predictions. Instead, the results uniformly support a model of deceptive message design based on conversational implicature.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 70-82 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Communication Monographs |
Volume | 63 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1996 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Language and Linguistics