Information Injustice and Intellectual Freedom: Polarizing Concepts for a Polarizing Time

Shannon M. Oltmann, Ana Ndumu, Emily J.M. Knox, John T.F. Burgess

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Historically, information professionals have advocated for intellectual freedom, specifically the rights to free speech and expression. The unrestricted flow of information has been foundational to library and information science practice. Yet, free speech at times is protected to the detriment of vulnerable communities. In this panel discussion, four library and information science researchers discuss the scholarly and pragmatic tensions surrounding LIS ethics and anti-hegemony. Using Chatman's (1996) concept of information poverty and Gibson and Martin's (2019) theory of information marginalization as discursive guides, the panelists will describe how they negotiate ethical principles, information justice, LIS professionalization, and social inclusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)625-629
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • information marginalization
  • information poverty
  • intellectual freedom
  • justice
  • social inclusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Computer Science
  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Information Injustice and Intellectual Freedom: Polarizing Concepts for a Polarizing Time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this