Abstract
Historically, information professionals have advocated for intellectual freedom, specifically the rights to free speech and expression. The unrestricted flow of information has been foundational to library and information science practice. Yet, free speech at times is protected to the detriment of vulnerable communities. In this panel discussion, four library and information science researchers discuss the scholarly and pragmatic tensions surrounding LIS ethics and anti-hegemony. Using Chatman's (1996) concept of information poverty and Gibson and Martin's (2019) theory of information marginalization as discursive guides, the panelists will describe how they negotiate ethical principles, information justice, LIS professionalization, and social inclusion.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 625-629 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- information marginalization
- information poverty
- intellectual freedom
- justice
- social inclusion
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Computer Science
- Library and Information Sciences