Influence of advanced notice record cards on waterfowl hunting participation and harvest distributions

Jerry J. Vaske, Jay Beaman, Craig A. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Wildlife management often requires accurate estimates of hunter participation and species harvested. Sending pre-season hunting cards for recording activity can improve the accuracy of estimates. This research note examined the influence of record cards on the shape of waterfowl hunting survey response distributions. Data were obtained from a 2013–2014 mail survey of 1,796 waterfowl hunters in Illinois. Results indicated that individuals who received a record card were: (a) more likely to report small harvest and days hunting values (beginning of distribution), and (b) less likely to give responses that contributed to heaping (middle of distribution) compared to non-record card recipients. Record cards did not influence the end of the distribution, as frequency functions for all respondents were long-tailed distributions. Results imply that record card responses are more accurate than non-record card responses. Non-record card estimates were approximately 10% biased. Results supported continued use of record cards to limit bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHuman Dimensions of Wildlife
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

waterfowl
hunting
wildlife management
distribution
harvest
notice
participation

Keywords

  • Harvest surveys
  • heaping
  • long-tailed distributions
  • record cards
  • waterfowl

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Influence of advanced notice record cards on waterfowl hunting participation and harvest distributions. / Vaske, Jerry J.; Beaman, Jay; Miller, Craig A.

In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{43bd73434b874b378e9d932b282b17ee,
title = "Influence of advanced notice record cards on waterfowl hunting participation and harvest distributions",
abstract = "Wildlife management often requires accurate estimates of hunter participation and species harvested. Sending pre-season hunting cards for recording activity can improve the accuracy of estimates. This research note examined the influence of record cards on the shape of waterfowl hunting survey response distributions. Data were obtained from a 2013–2014 mail survey of 1,796 waterfowl hunters in Illinois. Results indicated that individuals who received a record card were: (a) more likely to report small harvest and days hunting values (beginning of distribution), and (b) less likely to give responses that contributed to heaping (middle of distribution) compared to non-record card recipients. Record cards did not influence the end of the distribution, as frequency functions for all respondents were long-tailed distributions. Results imply that record card responses are more accurate than non-record card responses. Non-record card estimates were approximately 10{\%} biased. Results supported continued use of record cards to limit bias.",
keywords = "Harvest surveys, heaping, long-tailed distributions, record cards, waterfowl",
author = "Vaske, {Jerry J.} and Jay Beaman and Miller, {Craig A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10871209.2020.1699976",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Human Dimensions of Wildlife",
issn = "1087-1209",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of advanced notice record cards on waterfowl hunting participation and harvest distributions

AU - Vaske, Jerry J.

AU - Beaman, Jay

AU - Miller, Craig A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Wildlife management often requires accurate estimates of hunter participation and species harvested. Sending pre-season hunting cards for recording activity can improve the accuracy of estimates. This research note examined the influence of record cards on the shape of waterfowl hunting survey response distributions. Data were obtained from a 2013–2014 mail survey of 1,796 waterfowl hunters in Illinois. Results indicated that individuals who received a record card were: (a) more likely to report small harvest and days hunting values (beginning of distribution), and (b) less likely to give responses that contributed to heaping (middle of distribution) compared to non-record card recipients. Record cards did not influence the end of the distribution, as frequency functions for all respondents were long-tailed distributions. Results imply that record card responses are more accurate than non-record card responses. Non-record card estimates were approximately 10% biased. Results supported continued use of record cards to limit bias.

AB - Wildlife management often requires accurate estimates of hunter participation and species harvested. Sending pre-season hunting cards for recording activity can improve the accuracy of estimates. This research note examined the influence of record cards on the shape of waterfowl hunting survey response distributions. Data were obtained from a 2013–2014 mail survey of 1,796 waterfowl hunters in Illinois. Results indicated that individuals who received a record card were: (a) more likely to report small harvest and days hunting values (beginning of distribution), and (b) less likely to give responses that contributed to heaping (middle of distribution) compared to non-record card recipients. Record cards did not influence the end of the distribution, as frequency functions for all respondents were long-tailed distributions. Results imply that record card responses are more accurate than non-record card responses. Non-record card estimates were approximately 10% biased. Results supported continued use of record cards to limit bias.

KW - Harvest surveys

KW - heaping

KW - long-tailed distributions

KW - record cards

KW - waterfowl

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076509620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076509620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10871209.2020.1699976

DO - 10.1080/10871209.2020.1699976

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85076509620

JO - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

JF - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

SN - 1087-1209

ER -