Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies

Francesco Margoni, Renée Baillargeon, Luca Surian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examined whether 21-month-old infants could distinguish between two broad types of social power: respect-based power exerted by a leader (who might be an authority figure with legitimate power, a prestigious individual with merited power, or some combination thereof) and fear-based power exerted by a bully. Infants first saw three protagonists interact with a character who was either a leader (leader condition) or a bully (bully condition). Next, the character gave an order to the protagonists, who initially obeyed; the character then left the scene, and the protagonists either continued to obey (obey event) or no longer did so (disobey event). Infants in the leader condition looked significantly longer at the disobey than at the obey event, suggesting that they expected the protagonists to continue to obey the leader in her absence. In contrast, infants in the bully condition looked equally at the two events, suggesting that they viewed both outcomes as plausible: The protagonists might continue to obey the absent bully to prevent further harm, or they might disobey her because her power over them weakened in her absence. Additional results supported these interpretations: Infants expected obedience when the bully remained in the scene and could harm the protagonists if defied, but they expected disobedience when the order was given by a character with little or no power over the protagonists. Together, these results indicate that by 21 months of age, infants already hold different expectations for subordinates' responses to individuals with respect-based as opposed to fearbased power.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E8835-E8843
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume115
Issue number38
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2018

Fingerprint

Bullying
Power (Psychology)
Fear

Keywords

  • Authority
  • Bullying
  • Infancy
  • Prestige
  • Social power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies. / Margoni, Francesco; Baillargeon, Renée; Surian, Luca.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 115, No. 38, 18.09.2018, p. E8835-E8843.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6acd9cb7ea4b47bea04cefdd89d6dff7,
title = "Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies",
abstract = "We examined whether 21-month-old infants could distinguish between two broad types of social power: respect-based power exerted by a leader (who might be an authority figure with legitimate power, a prestigious individual with merited power, or some combination thereof) and fear-based power exerted by a bully. Infants first saw three protagonists interact with a character who was either a leader (leader condition) or a bully (bully condition). Next, the character gave an order to the protagonists, who initially obeyed; the character then left the scene, and the protagonists either continued to obey (obey event) or no longer did so (disobey event). Infants in the leader condition looked significantly longer at the disobey than at the obey event, suggesting that they expected the protagonists to continue to obey the leader in her absence. In contrast, infants in the bully condition looked equally at the two events, suggesting that they viewed both outcomes as plausible: The protagonists might continue to obey the absent bully to prevent further harm, or they might disobey her because her power over them weakened in her absence. Additional results supported these interpretations: Infants expected obedience when the bully remained in the scene and could harm the protagonists if defied, but they expected disobedience when the order was given by a character with little or no power over the protagonists. Together, these results indicate that by 21 months of age, infants already hold different expectations for subordinates' responses to individuals with respect-based as opposed to fearbased power.",
keywords = "Authority, Bullying, Infancy, Prestige, Social power",
author = "Francesco Margoni and Ren{\'e}e Baillargeon and Luca Surian",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1801677115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "E8835--E8843",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "38",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies

AU - Margoni, Francesco

AU - Baillargeon, Renée

AU - Surian, Luca

PY - 2018/9/18

Y1 - 2018/9/18

N2 - We examined whether 21-month-old infants could distinguish between two broad types of social power: respect-based power exerted by a leader (who might be an authority figure with legitimate power, a prestigious individual with merited power, or some combination thereof) and fear-based power exerted by a bully. Infants first saw three protagonists interact with a character who was either a leader (leader condition) or a bully (bully condition). Next, the character gave an order to the protagonists, who initially obeyed; the character then left the scene, and the protagonists either continued to obey (obey event) or no longer did so (disobey event). Infants in the leader condition looked significantly longer at the disobey than at the obey event, suggesting that they expected the protagonists to continue to obey the leader in her absence. In contrast, infants in the bully condition looked equally at the two events, suggesting that they viewed both outcomes as plausible: The protagonists might continue to obey the absent bully to prevent further harm, or they might disobey her because her power over them weakened in her absence. Additional results supported these interpretations: Infants expected obedience when the bully remained in the scene and could harm the protagonists if defied, but they expected disobedience when the order was given by a character with little or no power over the protagonists. Together, these results indicate that by 21 months of age, infants already hold different expectations for subordinates' responses to individuals with respect-based as opposed to fearbased power.

AB - We examined whether 21-month-old infants could distinguish between two broad types of social power: respect-based power exerted by a leader (who might be an authority figure with legitimate power, a prestigious individual with merited power, or some combination thereof) and fear-based power exerted by a bully. Infants first saw three protagonists interact with a character who was either a leader (leader condition) or a bully (bully condition). Next, the character gave an order to the protagonists, who initially obeyed; the character then left the scene, and the protagonists either continued to obey (obey event) or no longer did so (disobey event). Infants in the leader condition looked significantly longer at the disobey than at the obey event, suggesting that they expected the protagonists to continue to obey the leader in her absence. In contrast, infants in the bully condition looked equally at the two events, suggesting that they viewed both outcomes as plausible: The protagonists might continue to obey the absent bully to prevent further harm, or they might disobey her because her power over them weakened in her absence. Additional results supported these interpretations: Infants expected obedience when the bully remained in the scene and could harm the protagonists if defied, but they expected disobedience when the order was given by a character with little or no power over the protagonists. Together, these results indicate that by 21 months of age, infants already hold different expectations for subordinates' responses to individuals with respect-based as opposed to fearbased power.

KW - Authority

KW - Bullying

KW - Infancy

KW - Prestige

KW - Social power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053462018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053462018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1801677115

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1801677115

M3 - Article

C2 - 30181281

AN - SCOPUS:85053462018

VL - 115

SP - E8835-E8843

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 38

ER -