Inequities of race, place, and gender among the communication citation elite, 2000-2019

  • Deen Freelon
  • , Meredith L. Pruden
  • , Kirsten A. Eddy
  • , Rachel Kuo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A recent wave of studies has focused on the identities of communication scholars, quantifying the degree to which Whites, men, and Americans dominate the discipline.This study analyzes the communication citation elite (CCE)-a group of 1,675 highly cited scholars in communication research-in terms of race, gender, and country of employment over 20 years. Applying computational methods and content analysis, we find that 91.5% of first-author CCE members are White, 74.3% are men, and 78.6% work in the United States. Longitudinal analyses of each identity category reveal only minor shifts, most prominently slight gains for women and non-U.S. scholars. White representation among first authors decreased less than 4 percentage points over the study period (from 95.1% to 91.2%), with Black representation ending lower than it began (0.61% to 0.54%). Data from the International Communication Association indicate that the CCE is substantially more American and male than the organization's full membership as of 2021.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-367
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume73
Issue number4
Early online dateFeb 17 2023
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2023

Keywords

  • citation
  • gender
  • inequity
  • race
  • WEIRD

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inequities of race, place, and gender among the communication citation elite, 2000-2019'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this