Individual Privacy Interests and the `Special Needs' Analysis for Involuntary Drug and HIV Tests.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Examines the methods by which courts in the United States (US) have determined whether certain categories of searches are reasonable within the context of US Constitution. Contention that the analysis under which the US Supreme Court have evaluated such searches involving cases of urine tests and HIV tests is flawed; Proposition on the proper analysis that should be applied in such cases.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-177
Number of pages59
JournalCalifornia Law Review
Volume86
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Keywords

  • Searches & seizures (Law)
  • Civil rights -- United States
  • United States

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Individual Privacy Interests and the `Special Needs' Analysis for Involuntary Drug and HIV Tests.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this