Examines the methods by which courts in the United States (US) have determined whether certain categories of searches are reasonable within the context of US Constitution. Contention that the analysis under which the US Supreme Court have evaluated such searches involving cases of urine tests and HIV tests is flawed; Proposition on the proper analysis that should be applied in such cases.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||59|
|Journal||California Law Review|
|State||Published - Jan 1 1998|
- Searches & seizures (Law)
- Civil rights -- United States
- United States