Indeterminacy of Heritability of Thought Disorder

Reply to Matthysse and Holzman (1988)

Howard Berenbaum, Thomas F. Oltmanns, Irving I. Gottesman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The points raised by Matthysse and Holzman (1988) center around two major issues: (a) how to measure thought disorder and (b) how to think about its relation to schizophrenia and the etiology of that disorder. Some of the limitations that Matthysse and Holzman (1988) note appear to be based on misunderstandings of our (Berenbaum, Oltmanns, & Gottesman, 1985) methods, particularly what we were measuring and why we were measuring it. We, too, were surprised to find no evidence that these fundamental aspects of formal thought disorder are heritable. We do not know whether other anomalies of verbal communication are heritable. The issue must be resolved through further empirical investigation. Finally, some aspects of the model proposed by Matthysse and Holzman are open to serious question. The assumption that there is no relation between severity of illness and the underlying liability that precipitated the illness is most likely incorrect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-109
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Abnormal Psychology
Volume97
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Indeterminacy of Heritability of Thought Disorder : Reply to Matthysse and Holzman (1988). / Berenbaum, Howard; Oltmanns, Thomas F.; Gottesman, Irving I.

In: Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 97, No. 1, 01.01.1988, p. 108-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berenbaum, Howard ; Oltmanns, Thomas F. ; Gottesman, Irving I. / Indeterminacy of Heritability of Thought Disorder : Reply to Matthysse and Holzman (1988). In: Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1988 ; Vol. 97, No. 1. pp. 108-109.
@article{a327a3fdf2604a5799fe32a3d93fda9a,
title = "Indeterminacy of Heritability of Thought Disorder: Reply to Matthysse and Holzman (1988)",
abstract = "The points raised by Matthysse and Holzman (1988) center around two major issues: (a) how to measure thought disorder and (b) how to think about its relation to schizophrenia and the etiology of that disorder. Some of the limitations that Matthysse and Holzman (1988) note appear to be based on misunderstandings of our (Berenbaum, Oltmanns, & Gottesman, 1985) methods, particularly what we were measuring and why we were measuring it. We, too, were surprised to find no evidence that these fundamental aspects of formal thought disorder are heritable. We do not know whether other anomalies of verbal communication are heritable. The issue must be resolved through further empirical investigation. Finally, some aspects of the model proposed by Matthysse and Holzman are open to serious question. The assumption that there is no relation between severity of illness and the underlying liability that precipitated the illness is most likely incorrect.",
author = "Howard Berenbaum and Oltmanns, {Thomas F.} and Gottesman, {Irving I.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0021-843X.97.1.108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "108--109",
journal = "Journal of Abnormal Psychology",
issn = "0021-843X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indeterminacy of Heritability of Thought Disorder

T2 - Reply to Matthysse and Holzman (1988)

AU - Berenbaum, Howard

AU - Oltmanns, Thomas F.

AU - Gottesman, Irving I.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - The points raised by Matthysse and Holzman (1988) center around two major issues: (a) how to measure thought disorder and (b) how to think about its relation to schizophrenia and the etiology of that disorder. Some of the limitations that Matthysse and Holzman (1988) note appear to be based on misunderstandings of our (Berenbaum, Oltmanns, & Gottesman, 1985) methods, particularly what we were measuring and why we were measuring it. We, too, were surprised to find no evidence that these fundamental aspects of formal thought disorder are heritable. We do not know whether other anomalies of verbal communication are heritable. The issue must be resolved through further empirical investigation. Finally, some aspects of the model proposed by Matthysse and Holzman are open to serious question. The assumption that there is no relation between severity of illness and the underlying liability that precipitated the illness is most likely incorrect.

AB - The points raised by Matthysse and Holzman (1988) center around two major issues: (a) how to measure thought disorder and (b) how to think about its relation to schizophrenia and the etiology of that disorder. Some of the limitations that Matthysse and Holzman (1988) note appear to be based on misunderstandings of our (Berenbaum, Oltmanns, & Gottesman, 1985) methods, particularly what we were measuring and why we were measuring it. We, too, were surprised to find no evidence that these fundamental aspects of formal thought disorder are heritable. We do not know whether other anomalies of verbal communication are heritable. The issue must be resolved through further empirical investigation. Finally, some aspects of the model proposed by Matthysse and Holzman are open to serious question. The assumption that there is no relation between severity of illness and the underlying liability that precipitated the illness is most likely incorrect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149368083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149368083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-843X.97.1.108

DO - 10.1037/0021-843X.97.1.108

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 108

EP - 109

JO - Journal of Abnormal Psychology

JF - Journal of Abnormal Psychology

SN - 0021-843X

IS - 1

ER -