TY - JOUR
T1 - Increasing relative abundance of non-cyanobacterial photosynthetic organisms drives ecosystem multifunctionality during the succession of biological soil crusts
AU - Xu, Lin
AU - Zhu, Bingjian
AU - Li, Chaonan
AU - Zhou, Zhichao
AU - Yao, Minjie
AU - Zhou, Xiaobing
AU - Wang, Junming
AU - Zhang, Bingchang
AU - Li, Xiangzhen
N1 - This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A2008, 32071548, 42077206), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFE0107000), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (41925028) and China Biodiversity Observation Networks (Sino BON). We thank the colleagues in Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, CAS for their help in field sampling and in providing environmental data. We appreciate the excellent edit work by Lisa Sheppard. Opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily of the Illinois State Water Survey, the Prairie Research Institute, or the University of Illinois. No conflicts of interest have been declared. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support for this research from the Illinois State Water Survey at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are essential for ecosystem functioning, especially in drylands. However, we lack the knowledge of how ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF) responds to the development of biocrusts and the key factors mediating EMF during biocrust succession. In this study, we tested a series of essential ecosystem functions of the biocrust system and calculated a weighted EMF index, a processes-based EMFprocesses index, and a resource storage and availability based EMFpools index. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and ITS gene was used to test differences in the community compositions of 16S rRNA gene-based organisms and ITS gene-based fungi in different biocrust stages. Results showed that the changing patterns and driving factors of all the three multifunctionality indices were similar. Later developed biocrust stages exhibited higher values of all three EMF indices. The 16S rRNA gene-based diversity reduced with biocrust succession. Biodiversity-EMF relationships varied when considering different biocrust stages and organisms. Across all biocrust stages, significantly negative relationships existed between the EMF indices and 16S rRNA based α-diversity, whereas positive relationships occurred between the EMF indices and both 16S rRNA and ITS gene-based β-diversity. Further analyses indicated that the increasing relative abundance of non-cyanobacterial photosynthetic organisms (represented by chloroplast sequences and lichenized fungi) was the key predictor of all three EMF indices during biocrust succession. Specifically, these organisms were Streptophyta, Chlorophyta and Bacillariophyta and lichenized fungi, e.g., Verrucaria, Caloplaca and Aspicilia. This study provided a mechanistic understanding of how biological compositions and diversity drive EMF with biocrust development.
AB - Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are essential for ecosystem functioning, especially in drylands. However, we lack the knowledge of how ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF) responds to the development of biocrusts and the key factors mediating EMF during biocrust succession. In this study, we tested a series of essential ecosystem functions of the biocrust system and calculated a weighted EMF index, a processes-based EMFprocesses index, and a resource storage and availability based EMFpools index. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and ITS gene was used to test differences in the community compositions of 16S rRNA gene-based organisms and ITS gene-based fungi in different biocrust stages. Results showed that the changing patterns and driving factors of all the three multifunctionality indices were similar. Later developed biocrust stages exhibited higher values of all three EMF indices. The 16S rRNA gene-based diversity reduced with biocrust succession. Biodiversity-EMF relationships varied when considering different biocrust stages and organisms. Across all biocrust stages, significantly negative relationships existed between the EMF indices and 16S rRNA based α-diversity, whereas positive relationships occurred between the EMF indices and both 16S rRNA and ITS gene-based β-diversity. Further analyses indicated that the increasing relative abundance of non-cyanobacterial photosynthetic organisms (represented by chloroplast sequences and lichenized fungi) was the key predictor of all three EMF indices during biocrust succession. Specifically, these organisms were Streptophyta, Chlorophyta and Bacillariophyta and lichenized fungi, e.g., Verrucaria, Caloplaca and Aspicilia. This study provided a mechanistic understanding of how biological compositions and diversity drive EMF with biocrust development.
KW - Biocrusts
KW - Development stages
KW - Ecosystem multifunctionality
KW - Lichenized fungi
KW - Photosynthetic organisms
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85102643328
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85102643328#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115052
DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115052
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85102643328
SN - 0016-7061
VL - 395
JO - Geoderma
JF - Geoderma
M1 - 115052
ER -