Incorporating sociocultural phenomena into ecosystem-service valuation: The importance of critical pluralism

Carena J. Van Riper, Adam C. Landon, Sarah Kidd, Patrick Bitterman, Lee A. Fitzgerald, Elise F. Granek, Sonia Ibarra, David Iwaniec, Christopher M. Raymond, David Toledo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Ecosystem-services scholarship has largely focused on monetary valuation and the material contributions of ecosystems to human well-being. Increasingly, research is calling for a deeper understanding of how less tangible, nonmaterial values shape management and stakeholder decisions. We propose a framework that characterizes a suite of sociocultural phenomena rooted in key social science disciplines that are currently underrepresented in the ecosystem-services literature. The results from three example studies are presented to demonstrate how the tenets of this conceptual model can be applied in practice. We consider the findings from these studies in light of three priorities for future research: (1) complexities in individual and social functioning, (2) the salience and specificity of the perceived benefits of nature, and (3) distinctions among value concepts. We also pose a series of questions to stimulate reflection on how ecosystem-services research can adopt more pluralistic viewpoints that accommodate different forms of knowledge and its acquisition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-244
Number of pages12
JournalBioScience
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Conservation
  • Ecosystem Services
  • Interdisciplinary Science
  • Nonmonetary Valuation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Incorporating sociocultural phenomena into ecosystem-service valuation: The importance of critical pluralism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this