Including non-trade concerns: The environment in EU and US agricultural policy

Kathy Baylis, Gordon C. Rausser, Leo K. Simon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The challenge for any trade agreement is to be adaptable enough to enable countries to address legitimate non-trade concerns (NTC) while being restrictive enough to limit harm to other countries and to assist the creation of free international markets. In this paper, we focus on how environmental NTC have been addressed in agricultural policy in the USA and the European Union (EU) and the resulting implications for trade agreements. For example, programmes in the USA discourage production on environmentally sensitive land, while the EU encourages extensive production. While these and other differences will affect production and trade, the different approaches to agri-environmental policy affect the degree to which the two regions can use agri-environmental policy to offset commodity payments. This difference in flexibility will, in turn, affect how easily the two regions can accept a trade agreement that mandates greater reductions in trade-distorting price supports.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-276
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology
Volume4
Issue number3-4
StatePublished - Aug 26 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

trade agreements
trade agreement
agricultural policy
agri-environmental policy
European Union
environmental policy
agricultural subsidies
world markets
products and commodities
commodity
flexibility
market

Keywords

  • Agreement on agriculture
  • Agricultural policy
  • Agricultural trade
  • Conservation
  • Environment
  • Green-box
  • Multifunctionality
  • Non-trade concerns
  • WTO

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Including non-trade concerns : The environment in EU and US agricultural policy. / Baylis, Kathy; Rausser, Gordon C.; Simon, Leo K.

In: International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Vol. 4, No. 3-4, 26.08.2005, p. 262-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{394ea7a747d1470baffeefa3d59c656b,
title = "Including non-trade concerns: The environment in EU and US agricultural policy",
abstract = "The challenge for any trade agreement is to be adaptable enough to enable countries to address legitimate non-trade concerns (NTC) while being restrictive enough to limit harm to other countries and to assist the creation of free international markets. In this paper, we focus on how environmental NTC have been addressed in agricultural policy in the USA and the European Union (EU) and the resulting implications for trade agreements. For example, programmes in the USA discourage production on environmentally sensitive land, while the EU encourages extensive production. While these and other differences will affect production and trade, the different approaches to agri-environmental policy affect the degree to which the two regions can use agri-environmental policy to offset commodity payments. This difference in flexibility will, in turn, affect how easily the two regions can accept a trade agreement that mandates greater reductions in trade-distorting price supports.",
keywords = "Agreement on agriculture, Agricultural policy, Agricultural trade, Conservation, Environment, Green-box, Multifunctionality, Non-trade concerns, WTO",
author = "Kathy Baylis and Rausser, {Gordon C.} and Simon, {Leo K.}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "26",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "262--276",
journal = "International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology",
issn = "1462-4605",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Including non-trade concerns

T2 - The environment in EU and US agricultural policy

AU - Baylis, Kathy

AU - Rausser, Gordon C.

AU - Simon, Leo K.

PY - 2005/8/26

Y1 - 2005/8/26

N2 - The challenge for any trade agreement is to be adaptable enough to enable countries to address legitimate non-trade concerns (NTC) while being restrictive enough to limit harm to other countries and to assist the creation of free international markets. In this paper, we focus on how environmental NTC have been addressed in agricultural policy in the USA and the European Union (EU) and the resulting implications for trade agreements. For example, programmes in the USA discourage production on environmentally sensitive land, while the EU encourages extensive production. While these and other differences will affect production and trade, the different approaches to agri-environmental policy affect the degree to which the two regions can use agri-environmental policy to offset commodity payments. This difference in flexibility will, in turn, affect how easily the two regions can accept a trade agreement that mandates greater reductions in trade-distorting price supports.

AB - The challenge for any trade agreement is to be adaptable enough to enable countries to address legitimate non-trade concerns (NTC) while being restrictive enough to limit harm to other countries and to assist the creation of free international markets. In this paper, we focus on how environmental NTC have been addressed in agricultural policy in the USA and the European Union (EU) and the resulting implications for trade agreements. For example, programmes in the USA discourage production on environmentally sensitive land, while the EU encourages extensive production. While these and other differences will affect production and trade, the different approaches to agri-environmental policy affect the degree to which the two regions can use agri-environmental policy to offset commodity payments. This difference in flexibility will, in turn, affect how easily the two regions can accept a trade agreement that mandates greater reductions in trade-distorting price supports.

KW - Agreement on agriculture

KW - Agricultural policy

KW - Agricultural trade

KW - Conservation

KW - Environment

KW - Green-box

KW - Multifunctionality

KW - Non-trade concerns

KW - WTO

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844519318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23844519318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:23844519318

VL - 4

SP - 262

EP - 276

JO - International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology

JF - International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology

SN - 1462-4605

IS - 3-4

ER -