In the voices of parents: Suggestions for the next IDEA reauthorization

Meghan Maureen Burke, Linda Sandman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since its initial passage in 1975, parent involvement had been a cornerstone of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). However, parents face many barriers in voicing their concerns to professionals. One way for parents to share their insights and create systemic change is during an IDEA reauthorization. Yet, although the public is afforded the opportunity to provide feedback during a reauthorization, individual parent input is frequently under-represented. In this study, across urban, suburban, and rural regions of a state, we asked parents of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (N = 49) to provide videotaped testimonies about their concerns regarding IDEA. After qualitatively analyzing their testimonies, we found that parents wanted the next IDEA reauthorization to add supports (including applied behavior analysis services and teacher-student ratios), provide specificity regarding certain provisions (i.e., transition, least restrictive environment, and eligibility criteria for learning disabilities), and maintain or increase stipulations (paperwork provisions and federal funding, respectively). Implications for future research and policy are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-85
Number of pages15
JournalResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Parents
Education
Developmental Disabilities
Learning Disorders
Intellectual Disability
Students

Keywords

  • Advocacy
  • Family involvement
  • Low-incidence disabilities
  • Parent
  • Special education policy
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

In the voices of parents : Suggestions for the next IDEA reauthorization. / Burke, Meghan Maureen; Sandman, Linda.

In: Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, Vol. 40, No. 1, 03.2015, p. 71-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b5614620a6f045b2b8cd1ea604173ff1,
title = "In the voices of parents: Suggestions for the next IDEA reauthorization",
abstract = "Since its initial passage in 1975, parent involvement had been a cornerstone of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). However, parents face many barriers in voicing their concerns to professionals. One way for parents to share their insights and create systemic change is during an IDEA reauthorization. Yet, although the public is afforded the opportunity to provide feedback during a reauthorization, individual parent input is frequently under-represented. In this study, across urban, suburban, and rural regions of a state, we asked parents of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (N = 49) to provide videotaped testimonies about their concerns regarding IDEA. After qualitatively analyzing their testimonies, we found that parents wanted the next IDEA reauthorization to add supports (including applied behavior analysis services and teacher-student ratios), provide specificity regarding certain provisions (i.e., transition, least restrictive environment, and eligibility criteria for learning disabilities), and maintain or increase stipulations (paperwork provisions and federal funding, respectively). Implications for future research and policy are discussed.",
keywords = "Advocacy, Family involvement, Low-incidence disabilities, Parent, Special education policy, Training",
author = "Burke, {Meghan Maureen} and Linda Sandman",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/1540796915585109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "71--85",
journal = "Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities",
issn = "1540-7969",
publisher = "Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In the voices of parents

T2 - Suggestions for the next IDEA reauthorization

AU - Burke, Meghan Maureen

AU - Sandman, Linda

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - Since its initial passage in 1975, parent involvement had been a cornerstone of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). However, parents face many barriers in voicing their concerns to professionals. One way for parents to share their insights and create systemic change is during an IDEA reauthorization. Yet, although the public is afforded the opportunity to provide feedback during a reauthorization, individual parent input is frequently under-represented. In this study, across urban, suburban, and rural regions of a state, we asked parents of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (N = 49) to provide videotaped testimonies about their concerns regarding IDEA. After qualitatively analyzing their testimonies, we found that parents wanted the next IDEA reauthorization to add supports (including applied behavior analysis services and teacher-student ratios), provide specificity regarding certain provisions (i.e., transition, least restrictive environment, and eligibility criteria for learning disabilities), and maintain or increase stipulations (paperwork provisions and federal funding, respectively). Implications for future research and policy are discussed.

AB - Since its initial passage in 1975, parent involvement had been a cornerstone of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). However, parents face many barriers in voicing their concerns to professionals. One way for parents to share their insights and create systemic change is during an IDEA reauthorization. Yet, although the public is afforded the opportunity to provide feedback during a reauthorization, individual parent input is frequently under-represented. In this study, across urban, suburban, and rural regions of a state, we asked parents of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (N = 49) to provide videotaped testimonies about their concerns regarding IDEA. After qualitatively analyzing their testimonies, we found that parents wanted the next IDEA reauthorization to add supports (including applied behavior analysis services and teacher-student ratios), provide specificity regarding certain provisions (i.e., transition, least restrictive environment, and eligibility criteria for learning disabilities), and maintain or increase stipulations (paperwork provisions and federal funding, respectively). Implications for future research and policy are discussed.

KW - Advocacy

KW - Family involvement

KW - Low-incidence disabilities

KW - Parent

KW - Special education policy

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952000147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952000147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1540796915585109

DO - 10.1177/1540796915585109

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84952000147

VL - 40

SP - 71

EP - 85

JO - Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

JF - Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

SN - 1540-7969

IS - 1

ER -