Improving Medical Decision Making and Health Promotion through Culture-Sensitive Health Communication: An Agendafor Science and Practice

Cornelia Betsch, Robert Böhm, Collins O. Airhihenbuwa, Robb Butler, Gretchen B. Chapman, Niels Haase, Benedikt Herrmann, Tasuku Igarashi, Shinobu Kitayama, Lars Korn, Ülla Karin Nurm, Bernd Rohrmann, Alexander J. Rothman, Sharon Shavitt, John A. Updegraff, Ayse K. Uskul

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This review introduces the concept of culture-sensitive health communication. The basic premise is that congruency between the recipient's cultural characteristics and the respective message will increase the communication's effectiveness. Culture-sensitive health communication is therefore defined as the deliberate and evidence-informed adaptation of health communication to the recipients' cultural background in order to increase knowledge and improve preparation for medical decision making and to enhance the persuasiveness of messages in health promotion. To achieve effective health communication in varying cultural contexts, an empirically and theoretically based understanding of culture will be indispensable. We therefore define culture, discuss which evolutionary and structural factors contribute to the development of cultural diversity, and examine how differences are conceptualized as scientific constructs in current models of cultural differences. In addition, we will explicate the implications of cultural differences for psychological theorizing, because common constructs of health behavior theories and decision making, such as attitudes or risk perception, are subject to cultural variation. In terms of communication, we will review both communication strategies and channels that are used to disseminate health messages, and we will discuss the implications of cultural differences for their effectiveness. Finally, we propose an agenda both for science and for practice to advance and apply the evidence base for culture-sensitive health communication. This calls for more interdisciplinary research between science and practice but also between scientific disciplines and between basic and applied research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)811-833
Number of pages23
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Keywords

  • basic and applied research
  • disease and infection control
  • health communication
  • targeting and tailoring
  • treatment choice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Improving Medical Decision Making and Health Promotion through Culture-Sensitive Health Communication: An Agendafor Science and Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Betsch, C., Böhm, R., Airhihenbuwa, C. O., Butler, R., Chapman, G. B., Haase, N., Herrmann, B., Igarashi, T., Kitayama, S., Korn, L., Nurm, Ü. K., Rohrmann, B., Rothman, A. J., Shavitt, S., Updegraff, J. A., & Uskul, A. K. (2016). Improving Medical Decision Making and Health Promotion through Culture-Sensitive Health Communication: An Agendafor Science and Practice. Medical Decision Making, 36(7), 811-833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X15600434