Improving bioaerosol exposure assessments of composting facilities - Comparative modelling of emissions from different compost ages and processing activities

M. P.M. Taha, G. H. Drew, A. Tamer, G. Hewings, G. M. Jordinson, P. J. Longhurst, S. J.T. Pollard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We present bioaerosol source term concentrations from passive and active composting sources and compare emissions from green waste compost aged 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16 weeks. Results reveal that the age of compost has little effect on the bioaerosol concentrations emitted for passive windrow sources. However emissions from turning compost during the early stages may be higher than during the later stages of the composting process. The bioaerosol emissions from passive sources were in the range of 103-104 cfu m-3, with releases from active sources typically 1-log higher. We propose improvements to current risk assessment methodologies by examining emission rates and the differences between two air dispersion models for the prediction of downwind bioaerosol concentrations at off-site points of exposure. The SCREEN3 model provides a more precautionary estimate of the source depletion curves of bioaerosol emissions in comparison to ADMS 3.3. The results from both models predict that bioaerosol concentrations decrease to below typical background concentrations before 250 m, the distance at which the regulator in England and Wales may require a risk assessment to be completed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4504-4519
Number of pages16
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Volume41
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bioaerosols
  • Compost
  • Dispersion modelling
  • Emission rate
  • Exposure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Environmental Science
  • Atmospheric Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving bioaerosol exposure assessments of composting facilities - Comparative modelling of emissions from different compost ages and processing activities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this