TY - JOUR
T1 - Implicit Abandonment Distress
T2 - Testing the Dynamic Link Between Schema Activation and Physiological Arousal
AU - Thomas, Joel G.
AU - Bogdan, Paul C.
AU - Katsumi, Yuta
AU - Dolcos, Florin
AU - Berenbaum, Howard
N1 - This work was conducted in part at the Biomedical Imaging Center of the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC-BI-BIC). F.D. was supported by an Emanuel Donchin Professional Scholarship in Psychology from the University of Illinois. We thank Kelly Bost for her consultation regarding coding of the ASA measure. We are grateful for all the undergraduate research assistants who implemented the social rejection paradigm: Jaridd Albert, Dora Aleksonis, Adi Bates, Sam Bellows, Michael Conrad, Madison Ellin, Annalea Forrest, Gianna Gorzak, Theresa Hill, Noah Johnson, Lauren Kmetz, Robert Krissinger, Alexus Lee, Connor Leef, Andrew Mareczko, Stephanie Michalski, Josh Salinas, Kevin Soto, and Ethan Zhecheng.
PY - 2025/2/13
Y1 - 2025/2/13
N2 - Psychodynamic theory has been criticized as adhering to models of psychopathology that cannot lead to testable predictions and knowledge accumulation. To address this issue, we proposed an account of an implicit memory mechanism (a schema of abandonment) and measured the activation of this latent disposition in two meaningful contexts. Two hundred undergraduates were randomly assigned to either a social rejection or a comparison (non-reject) group, which was more ambiguous in nature. Explicit/implicit schema measures and psychophysiological data were used to test the relationship between schema activation and distress. As hypothesized, only the implicit schema measure was associated with physiological arousal; however, the nature of activation ran counter to our prediction. For participants with strong implicit abandonment schema content, significant arousal occurred in the comparison (non-reject) ambiguous group rather than the social rejection group. The findings demonstrate that: (1) implicit schema processes are indeed implicated in abandonment distress, and (2) situations in which the meaning of an event is more open to interpretation are likely more relevant to how schemas work. Altogether, findings suggest that psychodynamic processes are testable and may help account for distress dynamics, such as attempts to avoid real or imagined abandonment.
AB - Psychodynamic theory has been criticized as adhering to models of psychopathology that cannot lead to testable predictions and knowledge accumulation. To address this issue, we proposed an account of an implicit memory mechanism (a schema of abandonment) and measured the activation of this latent disposition in two meaningful contexts. Two hundred undergraduates were randomly assigned to either a social rejection or a comparison (non-reject) group, which was more ambiguous in nature. Explicit/implicit schema measures and psychophysiological data were used to test the relationship between schema activation and distress. As hypothesized, only the implicit schema measure was associated with physiological arousal; however, the nature of activation ran counter to our prediction. For participants with strong implicit abandonment schema content, significant arousal occurred in the comparison (non-reject) ambiguous group rather than the social rejection group. The findings demonstrate that: (1) implicit schema processes are indeed implicated in abandonment distress, and (2) situations in which the meaning of an event is more open to interpretation are likely more relevant to how schemas work. Altogether, findings suggest that psychodynamic processes are testable and may help account for distress dynamics, such as attempts to avoid real or imagined abandonment.
KW - Attachment mechanism
KW - Borderline features
KW - Mental representations
KW - Personality pathology
KW - Relational schemas
KW - Unconscious processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219044129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85219044129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1525/collabra.129168
DO - 10.1525/collabra.129168
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85219044129
SN - 2474-7394
VL - 11
JO - Collabra: Psychology
JF - Collabra: Psychology
IS - 1
M1 - 129168
ER -