TY - JOUR
T1 - Impacts of lower-leaf removal timing, number, and nitrogen application to flue-cured tobacco
AU - Finch, Camden E.
AU - Vann, Matthew C.
AU - Wells, Randy
AU - Fisher, Loren R.
AU - Brown, A. Blake
N1 - We thank Japan Tobacco International and the North Carolina Tobacco Research Commission for providing financial support of this research. We also thank Brett Bynum and Carl Watson for supervising these field trials at their respective research stations.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The removal and exclusion of lower-stalk tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum L.) from harvest continues to be encouraged by industry. Very little information addresses the timing aspect of leaf removal, specifically when it occurs near floral initiation. Research was conducted in 2016 and 2017 to evaluate each possible treatment combination of two lower-leaf removal programs (0 and 8 leaves/plant), three removal timings (2 wk before topping, at topping, and 2 wk after topping), and two N application rates (0 and 10 lb/ac). Soil plant analysis development (SPAD) measurements consistently revealed a lighter leaf color in treatments consisting of leaf removal 2 wk before topping, regardless of N application rate. Foliar cured leaf samples from upper-stalk positions also contained less total N when eight leaves (2.25%) were removed relative to zero leaves (2.32%). These results indicate that subsequent N fertilizer application did not supply N as efficiently as remobilization from lower, older leaves. In the 8-leaf removal program, both cured leaf yield and value declined by 27% relative to the 0-leaf program. Despite significant losses in yield and value, the 8-leaf program completely eliminated lug grades of tobacco. Leaf removal timing and N application rate did not affect yield, quality, value, or grade distribution. Our results suggest that there is no agronomic or cost to removing lower leaves 2 wk before or after topping; however, commercial farmers may find this information to be of use from a time management perspective, should they decide to implement this practice.
AB - The removal and exclusion of lower-stalk tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum L.) from harvest continues to be encouraged by industry. Very little information addresses the timing aspect of leaf removal, specifically when it occurs near floral initiation. Research was conducted in 2016 and 2017 to evaluate each possible treatment combination of two lower-leaf removal programs (0 and 8 leaves/plant), three removal timings (2 wk before topping, at topping, and 2 wk after topping), and two N application rates (0 and 10 lb/ac). Soil plant analysis development (SPAD) measurements consistently revealed a lighter leaf color in treatments consisting of leaf removal 2 wk before topping, regardless of N application rate. Foliar cured leaf samples from upper-stalk positions also contained less total N when eight leaves (2.25%) were removed relative to zero leaves (2.32%). These results indicate that subsequent N fertilizer application did not supply N as efficiently as remobilization from lower, older leaves. In the 8-leaf removal program, both cured leaf yield and value declined by 27% relative to the 0-leaf program. Despite significant losses in yield and value, the 8-leaf program completely eliminated lug grades of tobacco. Leaf removal timing and N application rate did not affect yield, quality, value, or grade distribution. Our results suggest that there is no agronomic or cost to removing lower leaves 2 wk before or after topping; however, commercial farmers may find this information to be of use from a time management perspective, should they decide to implement this practice.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099996152
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099996152#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1002/cft2.20059
DO - 10.1002/cft2.20059
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099996152
SN - 2374-3832
VL - 6
JO - Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
JF - Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
IS - 1
M1 - e20059
ER -