Impact of warm-season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois

Colleen Zumpf, Moon Sub Lee, Santanu Thapa, Jia Guo, Rob Mitchell, Jeffrey J. Volenec, Do Kyoung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The production of dedicated energy crops on marginally productive cropland is projected to play an important role in reaching the US Billion Ton goal. This study aimed to evaluate warm-season grasses for biomass production potential under different harvest timings (summer [H1], after killing frost [H2], or alternating between two [H3]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N/ha) on a wet marginal land across multiple production years. Six feedstocks were evaluated including Miscanthus x giganteus, two switchgrass cultivars (Panicum virgatum L.), prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link), and two polycultures including a mixture of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr.), and a mixture of big bluestem and prairie cordgrass. Across four production years, harvest timing and feedstock type played an important role in biomass production. Miscanthus x giganteus produced the greatest biomass (18.7 Mg/ha), followed by the switchgrass cultivar “Liberty” (14.7 Mg/ha). Harvest in H1 tended to increase yield irrespective of feedstock; the exception being M. x giganteus that had significantly lower biomass when harvested in H1 when compared to H2 and H3. The advantage H1 harvest had over H2 for all feedstocks declined over time, suggesting H2 or H3 would provide greater and more sustainable biomass production for the observed feedstocks. The N application rate played an important role mainly for M. x giganteus where 112 kg N/ha yielded more biomass than no N. Other feedstocks occasionally showed a slight, but statistically insignificant increase in biomass yield with increasing N rate. This study showed the potential of producing feedstocks for bioenergy on wet marginal land; however, more research on tissue and soil nutrient dynamics under different N rates and harvest regimes will be important in understanding stand longevity for feedstocks grown under these conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1202-1214
Number of pages13
JournalGCB Bioenergy
Volume11
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

warm season grasses
feedstocks
Feedstocks
agricultural land
grass
Biomass
Spartina pectinata
biomass
Andropogon gerardii
Panicum virgatum
Bouteloua curtipendula
Miscanthus giganteus
biomass production
prairie
cultivar
nitrogen fertilizers
Sorghastrum nutans
polyculture
soil nutrient dynamics
energy crop

Keywords

  • bioenergy feedstock
  • harvest and fertility management
  • marginal land
  • mixture
  • warm-season grass

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Impact of warm-season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois. / Zumpf, Colleen; Lee, Moon Sub; Thapa, Santanu; Guo, Jia; Mitchell, Rob; Volenec, Jeffrey J.; Lee, Do Kyoung.

In: GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 11, No. 10, 01.10.2019, p. 1202-1214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zumpf, Colleen ; Lee, Moon Sub ; Thapa, Santanu ; Guo, Jia ; Mitchell, Rob ; Volenec, Jeffrey J. ; Lee, Do Kyoung. / Impact of warm-season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois. In: GCB Bioenergy. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 10. pp. 1202-1214.
@article{5360ff6ee981445997692c7814007eab,
title = "Impact of warm-season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois",
abstract = "The production of dedicated energy crops on marginally productive cropland is projected to play an important role in reaching the US Billion Ton goal. This study aimed to evaluate warm-season grasses for biomass production potential under different harvest timings (summer [H1], after killing frost [H2], or alternating between two [H3]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N/ha) on a wet marginal land across multiple production years. Six feedstocks were evaluated including Miscanthus x giganteus, two switchgrass cultivars (Panicum virgatum L.), prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link), and two polycultures including a mixture of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr.), and a mixture of big bluestem and prairie cordgrass. Across four production years, harvest timing and feedstock type played an important role in biomass production. Miscanthus x giganteus produced the greatest biomass (18.7 Mg/ha), followed by the switchgrass cultivar “Liberty” (14.7 Mg/ha). Harvest in H1 tended to increase yield irrespective of feedstock; the exception being M. x giganteus that had significantly lower biomass when harvested in H1 when compared to H2 and H3. The advantage H1 harvest had over H2 for all feedstocks declined over time, suggesting H2 or H3 would provide greater and more sustainable biomass production for the observed feedstocks. The N application rate played an important role mainly for M. x giganteus where 112 kg N/ha yielded more biomass than no N. Other feedstocks occasionally showed a slight, but statistically insignificant increase in biomass yield with increasing N rate. This study showed the potential of producing feedstocks for bioenergy on wet marginal land; however, more research on tissue and soil nutrient dynamics under different N rates and harvest regimes will be important in understanding stand longevity for feedstocks grown under these conditions.",
keywords = "bioenergy feedstock, harvest and fertility management, marginal land, mixture, warm-season grass",
author = "Colleen Zumpf and Lee, {Moon Sub} and Santanu Thapa and Jia Guo and Rob Mitchell and Volenec, {Jeffrey J.} and Lee, {Do Kyoung}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gcbb.12627",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "1202--1214",
journal = "GCB Bioenergy",
issn = "1757-1693",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of warm-season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois

AU - Zumpf, Colleen

AU - Lee, Moon Sub

AU - Thapa, Santanu

AU - Guo, Jia

AU - Mitchell, Rob

AU - Volenec, Jeffrey J.

AU - Lee, Do Kyoung

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - The production of dedicated energy crops on marginally productive cropland is projected to play an important role in reaching the US Billion Ton goal. This study aimed to evaluate warm-season grasses for biomass production potential under different harvest timings (summer [H1], after killing frost [H2], or alternating between two [H3]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N/ha) on a wet marginal land across multiple production years. Six feedstocks were evaluated including Miscanthus x giganteus, two switchgrass cultivars (Panicum virgatum L.), prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link), and two polycultures including a mixture of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr.), and a mixture of big bluestem and prairie cordgrass. Across four production years, harvest timing and feedstock type played an important role in biomass production. Miscanthus x giganteus produced the greatest biomass (18.7 Mg/ha), followed by the switchgrass cultivar “Liberty” (14.7 Mg/ha). Harvest in H1 tended to increase yield irrespective of feedstock; the exception being M. x giganteus that had significantly lower biomass when harvested in H1 when compared to H2 and H3. The advantage H1 harvest had over H2 for all feedstocks declined over time, suggesting H2 or H3 would provide greater and more sustainable biomass production for the observed feedstocks. The N application rate played an important role mainly for M. x giganteus where 112 kg N/ha yielded more biomass than no N. Other feedstocks occasionally showed a slight, but statistically insignificant increase in biomass yield with increasing N rate. This study showed the potential of producing feedstocks for bioenergy on wet marginal land; however, more research on tissue and soil nutrient dynamics under different N rates and harvest regimes will be important in understanding stand longevity for feedstocks grown under these conditions.

AB - The production of dedicated energy crops on marginally productive cropland is projected to play an important role in reaching the US Billion Ton goal. This study aimed to evaluate warm-season grasses for biomass production potential under different harvest timings (summer [H1], after killing frost [H2], or alternating between two [H3]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N/ha) on a wet marginal land across multiple production years. Six feedstocks were evaluated including Miscanthus x giganteus, two switchgrass cultivars (Panicum virgatum L.), prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link), and two polycultures including a mixture of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr.), and a mixture of big bluestem and prairie cordgrass. Across four production years, harvest timing and feedstock type played an important role in biomass production. Miscanthus x giganteus produced the greatest biomass (18.7 Mg/ha), followed by the switchgrass cultivar “Liberty” (14.7 Mg/ha). Harvest in H1 tended to increase yield irrespective of feedstock; the exception being M. x giganteus that had significantly lower biomass when harvested in H1 when compared to H2 and H3. The advantage H1 harvest had over H2 for all feedstocks declined over time, suggesting H2 or H3 would provide greater and more sustainable biomass production for the observed feedstocks. The N application rate played an important role mainly for M. x giganteus where 112 kg N/ha yielded more biomass than no N. Other feedstocks occasionally showed a slight, but statistically insignificant increase in biomass yield with increasing N rate. This study showed the potential of producing feedstocks for bioenergy on wet marginal land; however, more research on tissue and soil nutrient dynamics under different N rates and harvest regimes will be important in understanding stand longevity for feedstocks grown under these conditions.

KW - bioenergy feedstock

KW - harvest and fertility management

KW - marginal land

KW - mixture

KW - warm-season grass

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073014013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073014013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.12627

DO - 10.1111/gcbb.12627

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073014013

VL - 11

SP - 1202

EP - 1214

JO - GCB Bioenergy

JF - GCB Bioenergy

SN - 1757-1693

IS - 10

ER -