TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Sugarcane Cultivation on C Cycling in Southeastern United States Following Conversion From Grazed Pastures
AU - Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria
AU - Blanc-Betes, Elena
AU - Bernacchi, Carl J
AU - Boughton, Elizabeth H
AU - Yang, Wendy
AU - Moore, Caitlin
AU - Pederson, Taylor L
AU - Saha, Amartya
AU - DeLucia, Evan H
N1 - Funding: This work was supported by the Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit of the USDA Agricultural Research Service, Urbana, IL. This work was funded by the DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Award Number DE-SC0018420), the US Department of Agriculture NIFA (Projects No. 2016-67019-24988 and 2021-67019-33431), and Arizona State University (AZ, USA; Award No. ASU092762). The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support from the Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit of the USDA Agricultural Research Service, Urbana, IL. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Department of Energy. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Archbold's Buck Island Ranch is a site within the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network and therefore this research is a contribution from LTAR. LTAR is supported by the United States Department of Agriculture. The authors would also like to thank research staff at the University of Illinois, at Archbold's Buck Island Ranch, and at Texas A&M that assisted with this research including Katie Bowman, Evan Dracup, Dr. Nicholas DeLucia, Tess Rutstein, Steffan Pierre, Alan Rivero, Hannah Van Zant, Nate Spicer, Carly Tolle, and Rohit Fenn, and many other undergraduate students, research assistants, and interns. We acknowledge Gene Lollis, Laurent Lollis, and Mary Margaret Hardee for leading sugarcane production. We would also like to thank Dr. Sneha Bandyopadhay for her comments on a draft of this manuscript.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - The expansion of sugarcane, a tropical high-yielding feedstock, will likely reshape the Southeastern United States (SE US) bioenergy landscape. However, the sustainability of sugarcane, particularly as it displaces grazed pastures, is highly uncertain. Here, we investigated how pasture conversion to sugarcane in subtropical Florida impacts net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) and net ecosystem carbon (C) balance (NECB). Measurements were made over three full growth cycles (> 3 years) in sugarcane—plant cane, PC; first ratoon cane, FRC; second ratoon cane, SRC—and in improved (IM) and semi-native (SN) pastures, which make up ca. 37% of agricultural land in the region. Immediately following conversion, PC was a stronger net source of CO2 than pastures, indicating the importance of CO2 losses related to land disturbance. Sugarcane, however, shifted to a strong net sink of CO2 after first regrowth, and overall sugarcane was a stronger net CO2 sink than pastures. Both stand age and low water availability during cane emergence and tillering substantially decreased its potential gross CO2 uptake. Accounting for all C gains and removals (i.e., NECB), greater frequency of burn events and repeated harvest increased removals and overall made sugarcane a stronger C source relative to pastures despite substantial C inputs from the previous land use and a stronger CO2 sink strength. Time since conversion substantially reduced C losses from sugarcane, and the NECB of SRC was similar to that of IM pasture but lower than that of SN pasture, indicating a rapid shift in the NECB of cane. We conclude that the C-balance implications following conversion will depend on the proportion of IM versus SN pastures converted to sugarcane. Furthermore, our findings suggest that no-burn harvest management strategies will be critical to the development of a sustainable bioenergy landscape in SE US.
AB - The expansion of sugarcane, a tropical high-yielding feedstock, will likely reshape the Southeastern United States (SE US) bioenergy landscape. However, the sustainability of sugarcane, particularly as it displaces grazed pastures, is highly uncertain. Here, we investigated how pasture conversion to sugarcane in subtropical Florida impacts net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) and net ecosystem carbon (C) balance (NECB). Measurements were made over three full growth cycles (> 3 years) in sugarcane—plant cane, PC; first ratoon cane, FRC; second ratoon cane, SRC—and in improved (IM) and semi-native (SN) pastures, which make up ca. 37% of agricultural land in the region. Immediately following conversion, PC was a stronger net source of CO2 than pastures, indicating the importance of CO2 losses related to land disturbance. Sugarcane, however, shifted to a strong net sink of CO2 after first regrowth, and overall sugarcane was a stronger net CO2 sink than pastures. Both stand age and low water availability during cane emergence and tillering substantially decreased its potential gross CO2 uptake. Accounting for all C gains and removals (i.e., NECB), greater frequency of burn events and repeated harvest increased removals and overall made sugarcane a stronger C source relative to pastures despite substantial C inputs from the previous land use and a stronger CO2 sink strength. Time since conversion substantially reduced C losses from sugarcane, and the NECB of SRC was similar to that of IM pasture but lower than that of SN pasture, indicating a rapid shift in the NECB of cane. We conclude that the C-balance implications following conversion will depend on the proportion of IM versus SN pastures converted to sugarcane. Furthermore, our findings suggest that no-burn harvest management strategies will be critical to the development of a sustainable bioenergy landscape in SE US.
KW - bioenergy
KW - biofuels
KW - carbon cycle
KW - establishment phase
KW - net ecosystem carbon balance
KW - net ecosystem CO exchange
KW - sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204907370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85204907370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.70003
DO - 10.1111/gcbb.70003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85204907370
SN - 1757-1693
VL - 16
JO - GCB Bioenergy
JF - GCB Bioenergy
IS - 10
M1 - e70003
ER -