TY - GEN
T1 - Impact of passenger trains in double track networks
AU - Sogin, Samuel L.
AU - Barkan, Christopher P.L.
AU - Lai, Yung Cheng
AU - Saat, Mohd Rapik
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - North American freight railroads are expected to experience increasing capacity constraints across their networks. To help plan for this increased traffic, railroads use simulation software to analyze the benefits of capacity expansion projects. Simultaneous operation of heterogeneous traffic further increases delay relative to additional homogenous traffic. Additional passenger trains can cause more delays to freight trains than additional freight trains. Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) was used to run simulations with varying mixes of unit freight and passenger trains operating at various speeds on a double track configuration. Basic assumptions on the relative difference in priority between train types lead to drastically different results on the impact of adding higher priority trains. This assumption dictates whether the track in the opposing direction should be used for overtake maneuvers. Also, higher speed differentials between train types can result in higher delays as faster trains catch up to slower trains more quickly. These analyses will help planners improve their understanding of the tradeoff in capacity due to operation of different types of trains at different priorities and speeds.
AB - North American freight railroads are expected to experience increasing capacity constraints across their networks. To help plan for this increased traffic, railroads use simulation software to analyze the benefits of capacity expansion projects. Simultaneous operation of heterogeneous traffic further increases delay relative to additional homogenous traffic. Additional passenger trains can cause more delays to freight trains than additional freight trains. Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) was used to run simulations with varying mixes of unit freight and passenger trains operating at various speeds on a double track configuration. Basic assumptions on the relative difference in priority between train types lead to drastically different results on the impact of adding higher priority trains. This assumption dictates whether the track in the opposing direction should be used for overtake maneuvers. Also, higher speed differentials between train types can result in higher delays as faster trains catch up to slower trains more quickly. These analyses will help planners improve their understanding of the tradeoff in capacity due to operation of different types of trains at different priorities and speeds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892630553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892630553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/JRC2012-74135
DO - 10.1115/JRC2012-74135
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84892630553
SN - 9780791844656
T3 - 2012 Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2012
SP - 485
EP - 490
BT - 2012 Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2012
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - 2012 Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2012
Y2 - 17 April 2012 through 19 April 2012
ER -