Impact of non-irrigation on 1G and 2G bioethanol potential of oilcane feedstock: A field to fuel pipeline study

Narendra Naik Deshavath, Baskaran Kannan, Hui Liu, William Woodruff, John Shanklin, Fredy Altpeter, Vijay Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study evaluates the bioethanol potential in response to irrigation (IR) and non-irrigation (NIR) of oilcane (OC) during a seasonal drought prior harvest. The juice was extracted through mechanical pressing of stems and fermented by Ethanol Red® yeast to produce first-generation bioethanol. Hydrothermal pretreatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of bagasse was performed to produce monomeric sugars from structural carbohydrates. The hydrolysates were fermented with engineered yeast for second-generation bioethanol production. The irrigated oilcane juice (276.3 ± 8.9 g/L) constitutes higher sugar concentrations than non-irrigated oilcane juice (236.5 ± 2.2 g/L). The enzymatic hydrolysis of IR-OC and NIR-OC pretreated bagasse yielded similar concentrations of 247.5 ± 2.22 and 249.7 ± 4.98 g/L fermentable sugars. Industry-relevant bioethanol titers of ≥99 g/L and ≥75 g/L were achieved from juice and hydrolysates, respectively. Therefore, the non-irrigation regime did not impact the 1G and 2G bioethanol titers. However, the overall bioethanol yield can be lower due to the reduction of stem yield (8 %) per hectare.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number134254
JournalFuel
Volume386
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2025

Keywords

  • Bioenergy
  • Bioethanol
  • Irrigation
  • Non-irrigation
  • Oilcane 1566
  • Sugar

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemical Engineering
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Organic Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of non-irrigation on 1G and 2G bioethanol potential of oilcane feedstock: A field to fuel pipeline study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this