Impact of management approach on project interaction and performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It has long been believed that improving project integration directly improves project performance. There has been a lack of quantitative research to directly support or negate this belief. This paper presents a method for approximating project integration, and demonstrates the impact of improved interaction on project performance. An earlier work developed a method for measuring an individual project's "degree of interaction" (DOI). Degree of interaction scores are calculated and compared for 38 projects, divided into traditional and alternative project approaches. The alternative projects have significantly higher average DOI scores than do traditional projects, indicating that they provide better opportunities for interaction. Project performance of alternative projects is better than that of traditional projects. The following four indicators of project performance are measured: cost growth, schedule growth, number of contract modifications, and modifications due to design deficiencies. The impact of improved interaction on objective performance measures is validated by studying 209 completed projects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-418
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume123
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1997

Fingerprint

Costs
Interaction
Project performance
Schedule
Performance measures
Quantitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Impact of management approach on project interaction and performance. / Pocock, James B.; Liu, Liang Y; Kim, Michael Kyong-il.

In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 123, No. 4, 12.1997, p. 411-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b20f9ec05ae4e50880b5e6978f7898f,
title = "Impact of management approach on project interaction and performance",
abstract = "It has long been believed that improving project integration directly improves project performance. There has been a lack of quantitative research to directly support or negate this belief. This paper presents a method for approximating project integration, and demonstrates the impact of improved interaction on project performance. An earlier work developed a method for measuring an individual project's {"}degree of interaction{"} (DOI). Degree of interaction scores are calculated and compared for 38 projects, divided into traditional and alternative project approaches. The alternative projects have significantly higher average DOI scores than do traditional projects, indicating that they provide better opportunities for interaction. Project performance of alternative projects is better than that of traditional projects. The following four indicators of project performance are measured: cost growth, schedule growth, number of contract modifications, and modifications due to design deficiencies. The impact of improved interaction on objective performance measures is validated by studying 209 completed projects.",
author = "Pocock, {James B.} and Liu, {Liang Y} and Kim, {Michael Kyong-il}",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:4(411)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "411--418",
journal = "Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9364",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of management approach on project interaction and performance

AU - Pocock, James B.

AU - Liu, Liang Y

AU - Kim, Michael Kyong-il

PY - 1997/12

Y1 - 1997/12

N2 - It has long been believed that improving project integration directly improves project performance. There has been a lack of quantitative research to directly support or negate this belief. This paper presents a method for approximating project integration, and demonstrates the impact of improved interaction on project performance. An earlier work developed a method for measuring an individual project's "degree of interaction" (DOI). Degree of interaction scores are calculated and compared for 38 projects, divided into traditional and alternative project approaches. The alternative projects have significantly higher average DOI scores than do traditional projects, indicating that they provide better opportunities for interaction. Project performance of alternative projects is better than that of traditional projects. The following four indicators of project performance are measured: cost growth, schedule growth, number of contract modifications, and modifications due to design deficiencies. The impact of improved interaction on objective performance measures is validated by studying 209 completed projects.

AB - It has long been believed that improving project integration directly improves project performance. There has been a lack of quantitative research to directly support or negate this belief. This paper presents a method for approximating project integration, and demonstrates the impact of improved interaction on project performance. An earlier work developed a method for measuring an individual project's "degree of interaction" (DOI). Degree of interaction scores are calculated and compared for 38 projects, divided into traditional and alternative project approaches. The alternative projects have significantly higher average DOI scores than do traditional projects, indicating that they provide better opportunities for interaction. Project performance of alternative projects is better than that of traditional projects. The following four indicators of project performance are measured: cost growth, schedule growth, number of contract modifications, and modifications due to design deficiencies. The impact of improved interaction on objective performance measures is validated by studying 209 completed projects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0005474505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0005474505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:4(411)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:4(411)

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0005474505

VL - 123

SP - 411

EP - 418

JO - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9364

IS - 4

ER -