Imaging implicit perception: Promise and pitfalls

Deborah E. Hannula, Daniel J. Simons, Neal J. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The study of implicit perception - perception in the absence of awareness - has a long history. Decades of behavioural work have identified crucial theoretical and methodological issues that must be considered when evaluating claims of implicit perception. Neuroimaging methods provide an important new avenue for illuminating our understanding of perception both with and without awareness, but most imaging experiments have not met the rigorous conditions that the behavioural work has shown are necessary for inferring implicit perception. Here, we review the literature of both behavioural and neuroimaging studies, and note the pitfalls of studying implicit perception as well as the promise that neuroimaging studies have for providing insights about implicit perception when combined with appropriately rigorous behavioural measures of awareness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-255
Number of pages9
JournalNature Reviews Neuroscience
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Neuroimaging
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Imaging implicit perception : Promise and pitfalls. / Hannula, Deborah E.; Simons, Daniel J.; Cohen, Neal J.

In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 6, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 247-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{f6a427d8eb9a49cf9ff26ac6fdda2ed9,
title = "Imaging implicit perception: Promise and pitfalls",
abstract = "The study of implicit perception - perception in the absence of awareness - has a long history. Decades of behavioural work have identified crucial theoretical and methodological issues that must be considered when evaluating claims of implicit perception. Neuroimaging methods provide an important new avenue for illuminating our understanding of perception both with and without awareness, but most imaging experiments have not met the rigorous conditions that the behavioural work has shown are necessary for inferring implicit perception. Here, we review the literature of both behavioural and neuroimaging studies, and note the pitfalls of studying implicit perception as well as the promise that neuroimaging studies have for providing insights about implicit perception when combined with appropriately rigorous behavioural measures of awareness.",
author = "Hannula, {Deborah E.} and Simons, {Daniel J.} and Cohen, {Neal J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1038/nrn1630",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "247--255",
journal = "Nature Reviews Neuroscience",
issn = "1471-003X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging implicit perception

T2 - Promise and pitfalls

AU - Hannula, Deborah E.

AU - Simons, Daniel J.

AU - Cohen, Neal J.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - The study of implicit perception - perception in the absence of awareness - has a long history. Decades of behavioural work have identified crucial theoretical and methodological issues that must be considered when evaluating claims of implicit perception. Neuroimaging methods provide an important new avenue for illuminating our understanding of perception both with and without awareness, but most imaging experiments have not met the rigorous conditions that the behavioural work has shown are necessary for inferring implicit perception. Here, we review the literature of both behavioural and neuroimaging studies, and note the pitfalls of studying implicit perception as well as the promise that neuroimaging studies have for providing insights about implicit perception when combined with appropriately rigorous behavioural measures of awareness.

AB - The study of implicit perception - perception in the absence of awareness - has a long history. Decades of behavioural work have identified crucial theoretical and methodological issues that must be considered when evaluating claims of implicit perception. Neuroimaging methods provide an important new avenue for illuminating our understanding of perception both with and without awareness, but most imaging experiments have not met the rigorous conditions that the behavioural work has shown are necessary for inferring implicit perception. Here, we review the literature of both behavioural and neuroimaging studies, and note the pitfalls of studying implicit perception as well as the promise that neuroimaging studies have for providing insights about implicit perception when combined with appropriately rigorous behavioural measures of awareness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14844285431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14844285431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nrn1630

DO - 10.1038/nrn1630

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15738960

AN - SCOPUS:14844285431

VL - 6

SP - 247

EP - 255

JO - Nature Reviews Neuroscience

JF - Nature Reviews Neuroscience

SN - 1471-003X

IS - 3

ER -