Imaging implicit perception: Promise and pitfalls

Deborah E. Hannula, Daniel J. Simons, Neal J. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The study of implicit perception - perception in the absence of awareness - has a long history. Decades of behavioural work have identified crucial theoretical and methodological issues that must be considered when evaluating claims of implicit perception. Neuroimaging methods provide an important new avenue for illuminating our understanding of perception both with and without awareness, but most imaging experiments have not met the rigorous conditions that the behavioural work has shown are necessary for inferring implicit perception. Here, we review the literature of both behavioural and neuroimaging studies, and note the pitfalls of studying implicit perception as well as the promise that neuroimaging studies have for providing insights about implicit perception when combined with appropriately rigorous behavioural measures of awareness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-255
Number of pages9
JournalNature Reviews Neuroscience
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imaging implicit perception: Promise and pitfalls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this