TY - JOUR
T1 - Imagine no religion
T2 - Heretical disgust, anger and the symbolic purity of mind
AU - Ritter, Ryan S.
AU - Preston, Jesse L.
AU - Salomon, Erika
AU - Relihan-Johnson, Daniel
N1 - This research was supported by the John Templeton Foundation [grant number 29104] awarded to Jesse Preston
PY - 2016/5/18
Y1 - 2016/5/18
N2 - Immoral actions, including physical/sexual (e.g., incest) and social (e.g., unfairness) taboos, are often described as disgusting. But what about immoral thoughts, more specifically, thoughts that violate religious beliefs? Do heretical thoughts taint the purity of mind? The present research examined heretical disgust using self-report measures and facial electromyography. Religious thought violations consistently elicited both self-reported disgust and anger. Feelings of disgust also predicted harsh moral judgement, independent of anger, and were mediated by feelings of “contamination”. However, religious thought violations were not associated with a disgust facial expression (i.e., levator labii muscle activity) that was elicited by physically disgusting stimuli. We conclude that people (especially more religious people) do feel disgust in response to heretical thoughts that is meaningfully distinct from anger as a moral emotion. However, heretical disgust is not embodied in a physical disgust response. Rather, disgust has a symbolic moral value that marks heretical thoughts as harmful and aversive.
AB - Immoral actions, including physical/sexual (e.g., incest) and social (e.g., unfairness) taboos, are often described as disgusting. But what about immoral thoughts, more specifically, thoughts that violate religious beliefs? Do heretical thoughts taint the purity of mind? The present research examined heretical disgust using self-report measures and facial electromyography. Religious thought violations consistently elicited both self-reported disgust and anger. Feelings of disgust also predicted harsh moral judgement, independent of anger, and were mediated by feelings of “contamination”. However, religious thought violations were not associated with a disgust facial expression (i.e., levator labii muscle activity) that was elicited by physically disgusting stimuli. We conclude that people (especially more religious people) do feel disgust in response to heretical thoughts that is meaningfully distinct from anger as a moral emotion. However, heretical disgust is not embodied in a physical disgust response. Rather, disgust has a symbolic moral value that marks heretical thoughts as harmful and aversive.
KW - Anger
KW - Disgust
KW - Heretical thought
KW - Morality of mind
KW - Religion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928242304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928242304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02699931.2015.1030334
DO - 10.1080/02699931.2015.1030334
M3 - Article
C2 - 25899719
AN - SCOPUS:84928242304
SN - 0269-9931
VL - 30
SP - 778
EP - 796
JO - Cognition and Emotion
JF - Cognition and Emotion
IS - 4
ER -