TY - JOUR
T1 - Images and chocolate stimuli affect physiological and affective responses of consumers
T2 - A cross-cultural study
AU - Torrico, Damir Dennis
AU - Fuentes, Sigfredo
AU - Gonzalez Viejo, Claudia
AU - Ashman, Hollis
AU - Gunaratne, Nadeesha M.
AU - Gunaratne, Thejani M.
AU - Dunshea, Frank R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Sensory evaluation relies on explicit responses from consumers. Unconscious responses may complement the information regarding the emotional states of consumers. In this study, physiological, facial expression and sensory/emotional responses to different visual (images) and chocolate stimuli were evaluated using two groups (participants with Asian and Western backgrounds). Panellists (N = 60; 60% Asian-background and 40% Western-background) evaluated 15 images (5-positive/5-neutral/5-negative) and 4 chocolate samples (milk/60%-cocoa/70%-cocoa/candy-inclusions). Consumers assessed their emotions (3-point scale) and liking (9-point scale). Non-invasive peripheral skin temperature (ST), heart rate (BPM), and facial expressions using FaceReader™ (FR) were assessed. Western-background participants showed similar heart rate (55–59 vs. 54–59) and temperature (0.6–1.5 °C difference) compared to Asian-background participants for images and chocolate samples. BPM (54–59) was not different among stimuli. Consumer emotions (images = −0.87 to 1.00 and chocolate = 0.27 to 0.60) and liking (chocolate = 5.20 to 6.33) were evaluated for both groups. For Asian-background participants, ST was positively correlated to FR-happy (r = 0.45) and negatively correlated to FR-angry (r = −0.23) and FR-sad (r = −0.20). For Western-background participants, ST was positively correlated to FR-sad (r = 0.23) and negatively correlated to FR-angry (r = −0.35). Cultural differences were found when assessing images based on sensory responses. These findings will be useful to better understand acceptability based on unconscious and emotional responses.
AB - Sensory evaluation relies on explicit responses from consumers. Unconscious responses may complement the information regarding the emotional states of consumers. In this study, physiological, facial expression and sensory/emotional responses to different visual (images) and chocolate stimuli were evaluated using two groups (participants with Asian and Western backgrounds). Panellists (N = 60; 60% Asian-background and 40% Western-background) evaluated 15 images (5-positive/5-neutral/5-negative) and 4 chocolate samples (milk/60%-cocoa/70%-cocoa/candy-inclusions). Consumers assessed their emotions (3-point scale) and liking (9-point scale). Non-invasive peripheral skin temperature (ST), heart rate (BPM), and facial expressions using FaceReader™ (FR) were assessed. Western-background participants showed similar heart rate (55–59 vs. 54–59) and temperature (0.6–1.5 °C difference) compared to Asian-background participants for images and chocolate samples. BPM (54–59) was not different among stimuli. Consumer emotions (images = −0.87 to 1.00 and chocolate = 0.27 to 0.60) and liking (chocolate = 5.20 to 6.33) were evaluated for both groups. For Asian-background participants, ST was positively correlated to FR-happy (r = 0.45) and negatively correlated to FR-angry (r = −0.23) and FR-sad (r = −0.20). For Western-background participants, ST was positively correlated to FR-sad (r = 0.23) and negatively correlated to FR-angry (r = −0.35). Cultural differences were found when assessing images based on sensory responses. These findings will be useful to better understand acceptability based on unconscious and emotional responses.
KW - Chocolate
KW - Emotions
KW - Facial expressions
KW - Images stimuli
KW - Physiological reactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039442146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039442146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.11.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85039442146
SN - 0950-3293
VL - 65
SP - 60
EP - 71
JO - Food Quality and Preference
JF - Food Quality and Preference
ER -