Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Esse? Percipi? Referentiality and Subjectivity in Footfalls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article analyzes how, in Footfalls, Beckett erodes subjective certainty as well as bodily evidence by calling into question the stability of referential mechanisms. Focusing on proper names and analyzing closely how they articulate (or rather disarticulate) personal pronouns and bodily referents, it shows how their unhinging produces a de-stabilization of reality, which has the paradoxical effect of calling into question the subjective unity and permanence of the body present on stage. This article follows the various movements of this short play to trace series of shifts and glitches in the pragmatics of enunciation, and shows how these glitches call into question the identity of the enunciating ‘I’ as well as the reality of its links to the body that it refers to.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-53
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Beckett Studies
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Deixis
  • Footfalls
  • Proper names
  • Referentiality
  • Subjectivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Esse? Percipi? Referentiality and Subjectivity in Footfalls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this