Identifying factors controlling the continuous corn yield penalty

Laura F. Gentry, Matias L. Ruffo, Frederick E Below

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is widely accepted that yields decline when corn (Zea mays L.) is grown continuously vs. in rotation wiThsoybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], although causes for the yield reduction are unclear. The primary objective of this study was to elucidate the source(s) of the continuous corn yield penalty (CCYP). The experiment was conducted from 2005 to 2010 in east-central Illinois beginning wiThthird-year continuous corn (CC) or a soybean-corn (SC) rotation at six N fertilizer rates. Averaged across all years, yield at the agronomic optimum N rate for CC was 8.84 Mg ha-1 and for SC was 10.20 Mg ha-1, resulting in a CCYP of 1.36 Mg ha-1; values ranged yearly from 0.47 to 2.23 Mg ha-1. Using a regression model, three signifi cant and independent predictors explained >99% of the variability in the CCYP: unfertilized CC yield (0NCCYD), years in CC (CCYRS), and the difference between CC and SC delta yields (maximum yield - Unfertilized yield) (DELTADIFF). The strongest predictor, 0NCCYD, reflects net soil N mineralization and demonstrates that it decreases in CC systems. The CCYRS was strongly and positively correlated wiThCCYP, indicating that the CCYP increased through Year 7. We believe that CCYRS measures the effects of accumulated corn residue in CC systems. Finally, we consider DELTADIFFto be a measure of the interaction between yearly weather patterns and crop rotation, which results in more negative yield responses for CC than SC under hot or dry conditions. This study concluded that the primary causative agents of the CCYP are N availability, corn residue accumulation, and weather.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-303
Number of pages9
JournalAgronomy Journal
Volume105
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013

Fingerprint

corn
soybeans
weather
fertilizer rates
Glycine max
mineralization
nitrogen fertilizers
Zea mays

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Identifying factors controlling the continuous corn yield penalty. / Gentry, Laura F.; Ruffo, Matias L.; Below, Frederick E.

In: Agronomy Journal, Vol. 105, No. 2, 01.03.2013, p. 295-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gentry, Laura F. ; Ruffo, Matias L. ; Below, Frederick E. / Identifying factors controlling the continuous corn yield penalty. In: Agronomy Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 105, No. 2. pp. 295-303.
@article{9883d3f833764f77a6d19f8e4f8a45c2,
title = "Identifying factors controlling the continuous corn yield penalty",
abstract = "It is widely accepted that yields decline when corn (Zea mays L.) is grown continuously vs. in rotation wiThsoybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], although causes for the yield reduction are unclear. The primary objective of this study was to elucidate the source(s) of the continuous corn yield penalty (CCYP). The experiment was conducted from 2005 to 2010 in east-central Illinois beginning wiThthird-year continuous corn (CC) or a soybean-corn (SC) rotation at six N fertilizer rates. Averaged across all years, yield at the agronomic optimum N rate for CC was 8.84 Mg ha-1 and for SC was 10.20 Mg ha-1, resulting in a CCYP of 1.36 Mg ha-1; values ranged yearly from 0.47 to 2.23 Mg ha-1. Using a regression model, three signifi cant and independent predictors explained >99{\%} of the variability in the CCYP: unfertilized CC yield (0NCCYD), years in CC (CCYRS), and the difference between CC and SC delta yields (maximum yield - Unfertilized yield) (DELTADIFF). The strongest predictor, 0NCCYD, reflects net soil N mineralization and demonstrates that it decreases in CC systems. The CCYRS was strongly and positively correlated wiThCCYP, indicating that the CCYP increased through Year 7. We believe that CCYRS measures the effects of accumulated corn residue in CC systems. Finally, we consider DELTADIFFto be a measure of the interaction between yearly weather patterns and crop rotation, which results in more negative yield responses for CC than SC under hot or dry conditions. This study concluded that the primary causative agents of the CCYP are N availability, corn residue accumulation, and weather.",
author = "Gentry, {Laura F.} and Ruffo, {Matias L.} and Below, {Frederick E}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2134/agronj2012.0246",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "295--303",
journal = "Agronomy Journal",
issn = "0002-1962",
publisher = "American Society of Agronomy",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying factors controlling the continuous corn yield penalty

AU - Gentry, Laura F.

AU - Ruffo, Matias L.

AU - Below, Frederick E

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - It is widely accepted that yields decline when corn (Zea mays L.) is grown continuously vs. in rotation wiThsoybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], although causes for the yield reduction are unclear. The primary objective of this study was to elucidate the source(s) of the continuous corn yield penalty (CCYP). The experiment was conducted from 2005 to 2010 in east-central Illinois beginning wiThthird-year continuous corn (CC) or a soybean-corn (SC) rotation at six N fertilizer rates. Averaged across all years, yield at the agronomic optimum N rate for CC was 8.84 Mg ha-1 and for SC was 10.20 Mg ha-1, resulting in a CCYP of 1.36 Mg ha-1; values ranged yearly from 0.47 to 2.23 Mg ha-1. Using a regression model, three signifi cant and independent predictors explained >99% of the variability in the CCYP: unfertilized CC yield (0NCCYD), years in CC (CCYRS), and the difference between CC and SC delta yields (maximum yield - Unfertilized yield) (DELTADIFF). The strongest predictor, 0NCCYD, reflects net soil N mineralization and demonstrates that it decreases in CC systems. The CCYRS was strongly and positively correlated wiThCCYP, indicating that the CCYP increased through Year 7. We believe that CCYRS measures the effects of accumulated corn residue in CC systems. Finally, we consider DELTADIFFto be a measure of the interaction between yearly weather patterns and crop rotation, which results in more negative yield responses for CC than SC under hot or dry conditions. This study concluded that the primary causative agents of the CCYP are N availability, corn residue accumulation, and weather.

AB - It is widely accepted that yields decline when corn (Zea mays L.) is grown continuously vs. in rotation wiThsoybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], although causes for the yield reduction are unclear. The primary objective of this study was to elucidate the source(s) of the continuous corn yield penalty (CCYP). The experiment was conducted from 2005 to 2010 in east-central Illinois beginning wiThthird-year continuous corn (CC) or a soybean-corn (SC) rotation at six N fertilizer rates. Averaged across all years, yield at the agronomic optimum N rate for CC was 8.84 Mg ha-1 and for SC was 10.20 Mg ha-1, resulting in a CCYP of 1.36 Mg ha-1; values ranged yearly from 0.47 to 2.23 Mg ha-1. Using a regression model, three signifi cant and independent predictors explained >99% of the variability in the CCYP: unfertilized CC yield (0NCCYD), years in CC (CCYRS), and the difference between CC and SC delta yields (maximum yield - Unfertilized yield) (DELTADIFF). The strongest predictor, 0NCCYD, reflects net soil N mineralization and demonstrates that it decreases in CC systems. The CCYRS was strongly and positively correlated wiThCCYP, indicating that the CCYP increased through Year 7. We believe that CCYRS measures the effects of accumulated corn residue in CC systems. Finally, we consider DELTADIFFto be a measure of the interaction between yearly weather patterns and crop rotation, which results in more negative yield responses for CC than SC under hot or dry conditions. This study concluded that the primary causative agents of the CCYP are N availability, corn residue accumulation, and weather.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875164025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875164025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2134/agronj2012.0246

DO - 10.2134/agronj2012.0246

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875164025

VL - 105

SP - 295

EP - 303

JO - Agronomy Journal

JF - Agronomy Journal

SN - 0002-1962

IS - 2

ER -