TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of Convective Boundary Layer Depth over the Great Lakes Region Using Aircraft Observations
T2 - A Comparison of Various Methods
AU - Bhimireddy, Sudheer R.
AU - Kristovich, David A.R.
N1 - Acknowledgments. Funding for this study was provided from National Science Foundation (NSF) Award AGS 20-15672. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Illinois State Water Survey, the Prairie Research Institute, the University of Illinois, or the NSF. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
for this study was provided from National Science Foundation (NSF) Award AGS 20-15672. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Illinois State Water Survey, the Prairie Research Institute, the University of Illinois, or the NSF. The authors declare that there is no conflictofinterest.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - This study evaluates the methods of identifying the height zi of the top of the convective boundary layer (CBL) during winter (December and January) over the Great Lakes and nearby land areas using observations taken by the University of Wyoming King Air research aircraft during the Lake-Induced Convection Experiment (1997/98) and Ontario Winter Lakeeffect Systems (2013/14) field campaigns. Since CBLs facilitate vertical mixing near the surface, the most direct measurement of zi is that above which the vertical velocity turbulent fluctuations are weak or absent. Thus, we use zi from the turbulence method as the “reference value” to which zi from other methods, based on bulk Richardson number (Rib), liquid water content, and vertical gradients of potential temperature, relative humidity, and water vapor mixing ratio, are compared. The potential temperature gradient method using a threshold value of 0.015 K m21 for soundings over land and 0.011 K m21 for soundings over lake provided the estimates of zi that are most consistent with the turbulence method. The Rib threshold-based method, commonly used in numerical simulation studies, underestimated zi. Analyzing the methods’ performance on the averaging window zavg we recommend using zavg 5 20 or 50 m for zi estimations for lake-effect boundary layers. The present dataset consists of both cloudy and cloudfree boundary layers, some having decoupled boundary layers above the inversion top. Because cases of decoupled boundary layers appear to be formed by nearby synoptic storms, we recommend use of the more general term, elevated mixed layers.
AB - This study evaluates the methods of identifying the height zi of the top of the convective boundary layer (CBL) during winter (December and January) over the Great Lakes and nearby land areas using observations taken by the University of Wyoming King Air research aircraft during the Lake-Induced Convection Experiment (1997/98) and Ontario Winter Lakeeffect Systems (2013/14) field campaigns. Since CBLs facilitate vertical mixing near the surface, the most direct measurement of zi is that above which the vertical velocity turbulent fluctuations are weak or absent. Thus, we use zi from the turbulence method as the “reference value” to which zi from other methods, based on bulk Richardson number (Rib), liquid water content, and vertical gradients of potential temperature, relative humidity, and water vapor mixing ratio, are compared. The potential temperature gradient method using a threshold value of 0.015 K m21 for soundings over land and 0.011 K m21 for soundings over lake provided the estimates of zi that are most consistent with the turbulence method. The Rib threshold-based method, commonly used in numerical simulation studies, underestimated zi. Analyzing the methods’ performance on the averaging window zavg we recommend using zavg 5 20 or 50 m for zi estimations for lake-effect boundary layers. The present dataset consists of both cloudy and cloudfree boundary layers, some having decoupled boundary layers above the inversion top. Because cases of decoupled boundary layers appear to be formed by nearby synoptic storms, we recommend use of the more general term, elevated mixed layers.
KW - Aircraft observations
KW - Boundary layer
KW - Convective-scale processes
KW - Lake effects
KW - Mixed layer
KW - Soundings
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186123292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85186123292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/JAMC-D-23-0114.1
DO - 10.1175/JAMC-D-23-0114.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85186123292
SN - 1558-8424
VL - 63
SP - 401
EP - 423
JO - Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
JF - Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
IS - 3
ER -