TY - JOUR
T1 - Hybrid markets, tick size and investor trading costs
AU - Portniaguina, Evgenia
AU - Bernhardt, Dan
AU - Hughson, Eric
N1 - Funding Information:
The first author is grateful to the University of Utah Graduate School for financial support. The second author acknowledges financial support from NSF grant SES-0317700. The third author is grateful to the Guiney Research Foundation for financial support. We thank Shmuel Baruch and seminar participants at the New York Stock Exchange and at the University of Oklahoma for valuable comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.
Copyright:
Copyright 2006 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/11
Y1 - 2006/11
N2 - This paper shows how the tick size affects equilibrium outcomes in a hybrid stock market such as the NYSE that features both a specialist and a limit order book. Reducing the tick size facilitates the specialist's ability to step ahead of the limit order book, resulting in a reduction in the cumulative depth of the limit order book at prices above the minimum tick. If market demand is price-sensitive, and there are costs of limit order submission, the limit order book can be destroyed by tick sizes that are either too small or too large. We show that trading cost is minimized at larger tick sizes for larger market orders, creating an incentive to submit smaller orders when tick size is reduced. With a smaller tick size, specialist participation increases and specialist profit increases slightly for small market orders, and considerably for large market orders.
AB - This paper shows how the tick size affects equilibrium outcomes in a hybrid stock market such as the NYSE that features both a specialist and a limit order book. Reducing the tick size facilitates the specialist's ability to step ahead of the limit order book, resulting in a reduction in the cumulative depth of the limit order book at prices above the minimum tick. If market demand is price-sensitive, and there are costs of limit order submission, the limit order book can be destroyed by tick sizes that are either too small or too large. We show that trading cost is minimized at larger tick sizes for larger market orders, creating an incentive to submit smaller orders when tick size is reduced. With a smaller tick size, specialist participation increases and specialist profit increases slightly for small market orders, and considerably for large market orders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749354048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749354048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.finmar.2006.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.finmar.2006.02.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33749354048
SN - 1386-4181
VL - 9
SP - 433
EP - 447
JO - Journal of Financial Markets
JF - Journal of Financial Markets
IS - 4
ER -