Hunter Preference of Harvest Reporting Methods on Public Lands in Illinois

Ryan J. Conat, Craig A. Miller

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

A multiple harvest reporting system is used for hunters in Illinois. Currently, Illinois harvest reporting methods on public hunting sites include: check-in stations, telephone check-in, online check-in, online windshield cards, and site-specific harvest reporting (i.e. clipboard harvest checks). The Illinois Department of Natural Resources is interested in condensing the harvest reporting system to one statewide method for public land in Illinois. We sampled 2,830 purchasers of 2016 Illinois hunting licenses from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources licensing database that indicated hunting public land in Illinois. Licensees were mailed a 4-page self-administered questionnaire designed to query hunters about the harvest reporting systems used on public land in Illinois. We received 1,580 questionnaires, 1476 of which were usable, for a 57.7% response rate. We tested variables related to a hunter’s preference for harvest reporting systems to be used on public land in Illinois. Respondents indicated preferring telephone check-in (38.1%) the most often, followed by online check-in (25.4%), check stations (21.3%), and the online windshield card system (15.1%). Additionally, hunters were significantly more likely to prefer a harvest reporting system if they had experience using that system. During the 2016-2017 season, hunters averaged 45.5 years (± 16.45, n=1,464) of age. Hunters age 31-40 preferred online check-in the most (34.6%), while only 18.1% of hunters older than 60 years of age preferred online check-in harvest reporting most. Survey respondents also gave their attitudes towards statements regarding the harvest reporting system on a 7-point scale (1 = “strongly disagree,” 4 = “unsure,” and 7 = “strongly agree”). The majority of hunters (68%) agreed that with the statement, “The IDNR should require only ONE statewide harvest reporting system for all public access lands”. These findings further our understanding of factors that contribute to hunter preference of harvest reporting methods
Original languageEnglish (US)
StatePublished - 2018
Event2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference - Milwaukee, United States
Duration: Jan 28 2018Jan 31 2018
Conference number: 78

Conference

Conference2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference
CountryUnited States
CityMilwaukee
Period1/28/181/31/18

Fingerprint

hunting
land
harvest
method
public
natural resource
public access
station
licencing
rate
hunting licence

Keywords

  • INHS

Cite this

Conat, R. J., & Miller, C. A. (2018). Hunter Preference of Harvest Reporting Methods on Public Lands in Illinois. Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States.

Hunter Preference of Harvest Reporting Methods on Public Lands in Illinois. / Conat, Ryan J.; Miller, Craig A.

2018. Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Conat, RJ & Miller, CA 2018, 'Hunter Preference of Harvest Reporting Methods on Public Lands in Illinois' Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States, 1/28/18 - 1/31/18, .
Conat RJ, Miller CA. Hunter Preference of Harvest Reporting Methods on Public Lands in Illinois. 2018. Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States.
Conat, Ryan J. ; Miller, Craig A. / Hunter Preference of Harvest Reporting Methods on Public Lands in Illinois. Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States.
@conference{ad1f12f9fcf44a12bb4a8974309865a4,
title = "Hunter Preference of Harvest Reporting Methods on Public Lands in Illinois",
abstract = "A multiple harvest reporting system is used for hunters in Illinois. Currently, Illinois harvest reporting methods on public hunting sites include: check-in stations, telephone check-in, online check-in, online windshield cards, and site-specific harvest reporting (i.e. clipboard harvest checks). The Illinois Department of Natural Resources is interested in condensing the harvest reporting system to one statewide method for public land in Illinois. We sampled 2,830 purchasers of 2016 Illinois hunting licenses from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources licensing database that indicated hunting public land in Illinois. Licensees were mailed a 4-page self-administered questionnaire designed to query hunters about the harvest reporting systems used on public land in Illinois. We received 1,580 questionnaires, 1476 of which were usable, for a 57.7{\%} response rate. We tested variables related to a hunter’s preference for harvest reporting systems to be used on public land in Illinois. Respondents indicated preferring telephone check-in (38.1{\%}) the most often, followed by online check-in (25.4{\%}), check stations (21.3{\%}), and the online windshield card system (15.1{\%}). Additionally, hunters were significantly more likely to prefer a harvest reporting system if they had experience using that system. During the 2016-2017 season, hunters averaged 45.5 years (± 16.45, n=1,464) of age. Hunters age 31-40 preferred online check-in the most (34.6{\%}), while only 18.1{\%} of hunters older than 60 years of age preferred online check-in harvest reporting most. Survey respondents also gave their attitudes towards statements regarding the harvest reporting system on a 7-point scale (1 = “strongly disagree,” 4 = “unsure,” and 7 = “strongly agree”). The majority of hunters (68{\%}) agreed that with the statement, “The IDNR should require only ONE statewide harvest reporting system for all public access lands”. These findings further our understanding of factors that contribute to hunter preference of harvest reporting methods",
keywords = "INHS",
author = "Conat, {Ryan J.} and Miller, {Craig A.}",
year = "2018",
language = "English (US)",
note = "2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference ; Conference date: 28-01-2018 Through 31-01-2018",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Hunter Preference of Harvest Reporting Methods on Public Lands in Illinois

AU - Conat, Ryan J.

AU - Miller, Craig A.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - A multiple harvest reporting system is used for hunters in Illinois. Currently, Illinois harvest reporting methods on public hunting sites include: check-in stations, telephone check-in, online check-in, online windshield cards, and site-specific harvest reporting (i.e. clipboard harvest checks). The Illinois Department of Natural Resources is interested in condensing the harvest reporting system to one statewide method for public land in Illinois. We sampled 2,830 purchasers of 2016 Illinois hunting licenses from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources licensing database that indicated hunting public land in Illinois. Licensees were mailed a 4-page self-administered questionnaire designed to query hunters about the harvest reporting systems used on public land in Illinois. We received 1,580 questionnaires, 1476 of which were usable, for a 57.7% response rate. We tested variables related to a hunter’s preference for harvest reporting systems to be used on public land in Illinois. Respondents indicated preferring telephone check-in (38.1%) the most often, followed by online check-in (25.4%), check stations (21.3%), and the online windshield card system (15.1%). Additionally, hunters were significantly more likely to prefer a harvest reporting system if they had experience using that system. During the 2016-2017 season, hunters averaged 45.5 years (± 16.45, n=1,464) of age. Hunters age 31-40 preferred online check-in the most (34.6%), while only 18.1% of hunters older than 60 years of age preferred online check-in harvest reporting most. Survey respondents also gave their attitudes towards statements regarding the harvest reporting system on a 7-point scale (1 = “strongly disagree,” 4 = “unsure,” and 7 = “strongly agree”). The majority of hunters (68%) agreed that with the statement, “The IDNR should require only ONE statewide harvest reporting system for all public access lands”. These findings further our understanding of factors that contribute to hunter preference of harvest reporting methods

AB - A multiple harvest reporting system is used for hunters in Illinois. Currently, Illinois harvest reporting methods on public hunting sites include: check-in stations, telephone check-in, online check-in, online windshield cards, and site-specific harvest reporting (i.e. clipboard harvest checks). The Illinois Department of Natural Resources is interested in condensing the harvest reporting system to one statewide method for public land in Illinois. We sampled 2,830 purchasers of 2016 Illinois hunting licenses from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources licensing database that indicated hunting public land in Illinois. Licensees were mailed a 4-page self-administered questionnaire designed to query hunters about the harvest reporting systems used on public land in Illinois. We received 1,580 questionnaires, 1476 of which were usable, for a 57.7% response rate. We tested variables related to a hunter’s preference for harvest reporting systems to be used on public land in Illinois. Respondents indicated preferring telephone check-in (38.1%) the most often, followed by online check-in (25.4%), check stations (21.3%), and the online windshield card system (15.1%). Additionally, hunters were significantly more likely to prefer a harvest reporting system if they had experience using that system. During the 2016-2017 season, hunters averaged 45.5 years (± 16.45, n=1,464) of age. Hunters age 31-40 preferred online check-in the most (34.6%), while only 18.1% of hunters older than 60 years of age preferred online check-in harvest reporting most. Survey respondents also gave their attitudes towards statements regarding the harvest reporting system on a 7-point scale (1 = “strongly disagree,” 4 = “unsure,” and 7 = “strongly agree”). The majority of hunters (68%) agreed that with the statement, “The IDNR should require only ONE statewide harvest reporting system for all public access lands”. These findings further our understanding of factors that contribute to hunter preference of harvest reporting methods

KW - INHS

M3 - Paper

ER -