Human Footprint and Human Presence Have Non-Equivalent Effects on Wildlife Habitat Use

Keyphrases

• Human-to-human 100%
• Wildlife Habitat 100%
• Habitat Use 100%
• Equivalent Effect 100%
• Human Presence 100%
• Human Footprint 100%
• Building Density 42%
• Synanthropic Species 28%
• Activity Patterns 14%
• Occupancy 14%
• Human Detection 14%
• Mobile Species 14%
• Puma 14%
• Distribution Pattern 14%
• Expanded Access 14%
• Wildlife 14%
• Central California 14%
• Detection Probability 14%
• High Building 14%
• Residential Development 14%
• Mammal Community 14%
• Carnivores 14%
• Habitat Quality 14%
• Anthropogenic Activities 14%
• Commercial Development 14%
• Anthropogenic Effects 14%
• Resource Subsidies 14%
• Anthropogenic Resources 14%
• Omnivore 14%
• Anthropogenic Impact 14%
• Food Waste 14%
• Terrestrial Mammals 14%
• Camera Trap 14%
• Bobcat 14%
• Didelphis Virginiana 14%
• Virginia Opossum 14%
• Mephitis Mephitis 14%
• Striped Skunk 14%
• Puma Concolor 14%
• Occupancy Probability 14%
• Lynx Rufus 14%
• Wildlife Mortality 14%
• Nocturnality 14%
• Multi-species Occupancy Model 14%
• Human Fear 14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

• Wildlife Habitat 100%
• Bobcat 100%
• Anthropogenic Activity 50%
• Omnivore 50%
• Opossum 50%
• Camera-Trap 50%
• Florida Panther 50%
• Didelphis virginiana 50%
• Mephitis Mephitis 50%
• Striped Skunk 50%
• Puma 50%