How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics: The role of categories

William Ocasio, Jeffrey Loewenstein, Amit Nigam

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

We examine how streams of communication enable the reproduction and change of the underlying principles that constitute institutional logics. While past research has shown that communication provides instantiations of institutional logics, the link between specific instances of communication and the emergence of institutional logics has not been explicitly shown. To remedy this gap, we propose that collections of communicative events distributed throughout organizations and institutional fields can converge on systems of categories so as to yield the meaningful and durable principles that constitute institutional logics. We explore how four analytically distinct communicative functions - coordinating, sensegiving, translating, and theorizing - enable this emergent process of reproduction and change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-48
Number of pages21
JournalAcademy of Management Review
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Communication
Institutional logics
Sensegiving
Remedies
Theorizing
Durables

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics : The role of categories. / Ocasio, William; Loewenstein, Jeffrey; Nigam, Amit.

In: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 28-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{9535d3cc96f943d9ad2a624e400308c6,
title = "How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics: The role of categories",
abstract = "We examine how streams of communication enable the reproduction and change of the underlying principles that constitute institutional logics. While past research has shown that communication provides instantiations of institutional logics, the link between specific instances of communication and the emergence of institutional logics has not been explicitly shown. To remedy this gap, we propose that collections of communicative events distributed throughout organizations and institutional fields can converge on systems of categories so as to yield the meaningful and durable principles that constitute institutional logics. We explore how four analytically distinct communicative functions - coordinating, sensegiving, translating, and theorizing - enable this emergent process of reproduction and change.",
author = "William Ocasio and Jeffrey Loewenstein and Amit Nigam",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amr.2013.0274",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "28--48",
journal = "Academy of Management Review",
issn = "0363-7425",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics

T2 - The role of categories

AU - Ocasio, William

AU - Loewenstein, Jeffrey

AU - Nigam, Amit

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - We examine how streams of communication enable the reproduction and change of the underlying principles that constitute institutional logics. While past research has shown that communication provides instantiations of institutional logics, the link between specific instances of communication and the emergence of institutional logics has not been explicitly shown. To remedy this gap, we propose that collections of communicative events distributed throughout organizations and institutional fields can converge on systems of categories so as to yield the meaningful and durable principles that constitute institutional logics. We explore how four analytically distinct communicative functions - coordinating, sensegiving, translating, and theorizing - enable this emergent process of reproduction and change.

AB - We examine how streams of communication enable the reproduction and change of the underlying principles that constitute institutional logics. While past research has shown that communication provides instantiations of institutional logics, the link between specific instances of communication and the emergence of institutional logics has not been explicitly shown. To remedy this gap, we propose that collections of communicative events distributed throughout organizations and institutional fields can converge on systems of categories so as to yield the meaningful and durable principles that constitute institutional logics. We explore how four analytically distinct communicative functions - coordinating, sensegiving, translating, and theorizing - enable this emergent process of reproduction and change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923684749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923684749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/amr.2013.0274

DO - 10.5465/amr.2013.0274

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84923684749

VL - 40

SP - 28

EP - 48

JO - Academy of Management Review

JF - Academy of Management Review

SN - 0363-7425

IS - 1

ER -