How possible is sustainable urban development? an analysis of planners' perceptions about new urbanism, smart growth and the ecological city

Edward J. Jepson, Mary M. Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

New urbanism, smart growth and the ecological city have been proposed by advocates and others as being the essential equivalent of sustainable development as that term has been broadly defined. This paper focuses on how planners in the USA collectively define these three development approaches in terms of 14 principles of sustainable development. Based on a national survey of practicing planners in the USA, we find that planners everywhere have relatively high, but quite different, expectations regarding what can and should be accomplished under each of the three development approaches. Smart growth is matched most frequently with the sustainable development principles and is also the most understood. The ecological city, while least understood, becomes more frequently matched with the principles as familiarity increases. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these results for our quest to achieve a more sustainable development pattern.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-437
Number of pages21
JournalPlanning Practice and Research
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How possible is sustainable urban development? an analysis of planners' perceptions about new urbanism, smart growth and the ecological city'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this