TY - JOUR
T1 - How organizational minorities form and use social ties
T2 - Evidence from teachers in majority-white and majority-black schools
AU - Nelson, Jennifer L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Behavior and Theory area at the Tepper School of Business, the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and the NYU Stern Qualitative Paper Workshop. This research was supported by Emory University professional development funds and an Institute for Educational Sciences grant (R305B170009).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - This article draws on 11 months of multisite ethnographic fieldwork and 103 interviews to investigate how teachers in school faculty of varying racial compositions form and use their social ties to secure professional, political, and emotional resources at work. Findings show that, in general, white teachers in the numerical minority in their schools secured all resource types through their same-race ties, while black teachers in the numerical minority secured primarily emotional resources from their same-race ties. Given these observed differences, the author shows how the form and use of the two minority groups’ social ties stem in large part from distinctive organizational practices. In turn, the tie differences can account for differences in social integration and resource access in the organization. The data allow for comparisons to patterns among majority groups.
AB - This article draws on 11 months of multisite ethnographic fieldwork and 103 interviews to investigate how teachers in school faculty of varying racial compositions form and use their social ties to secure professional, political, and emotional resources at work. Findings show that, in general, white teachers in the numerical minority in their schools secured all resource types through their same-race ties, while black teachers in the numerical minority secured primarily emotional resources from their same-race ties. Given these observed differences, the author shows how the form and use of the two minority groups’ social ties stem in large part from distinctive organizational practices. In turn, the tie differences can account for differences in social integration and resource access in the organization. The data allow for comparisons to patterns among majority groups.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074044276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074044276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/705158
DO - 10.1086/705158
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074044276
VL - 125
SP - 382
EP - 430
JO - American Journal of Sociology
JF - American Journal of Sociology
SN - 0002-9602
IS - 2
ER -