How Important is Data Curation? Gaps and Opportunities for Academic Libraries

Lisa R Johnston, Jacob Carlson, Cynthia Hudson-Vitale, Heidi Imker, Wendy Kozlowski, Robert Olendorf, Claire Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Data curation may be an emerging service for academic libraries, but researchers actively “curate” their data in a number of ways—even if terminology may not always align. Building on past userneeds assessments performed via survey and focus groups, the authors sought direct input from researchers on the importance and utilization of specific data curation activities. METHODS Between October 21, 2016, and November 18, 2016, the study team held focus groups with 91 participants at six different academic institutions to determine which data curation activities were most important to researchers, which activities were currently underway for their data, and how satisfied they were with the results. RESULTS Researchers are actively engaged in a variety of data curation activities, and while they considered most data curation activities to be highly important, a majority of the sample reported dissatisfaction with the current state of data curation at their institution. DISCUSSION Our findings demonstrate specific gaps and opportunities for academic libraries to focus their data curation services to more effectively meet researcher needs. CONCLUSION Research libraries stand to benefit their users by emphasizing, investing in, and/or heavily promoting the highly valued services that may not currently be in use by many researchers.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2198
JournalJournal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 26 2018

Fingerprint

technical language
Group
utilization

Keywords

  • data curation
  • academic libraries
  • institutional repositories
  • researcher assessment

Cite this

How Important is Data Curation? Gaps and Opportunities for Academic Libraries. / Johnston, Lisa R; Carlson, Jacob; Hudson-Vitale, Cynthia; Imker, Heidi; Kozlowski, Wendy; Olendorf, Robert; Stewart, Claire.

In: Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, Vol. 6, No. 1, 26.04.2018, p. 2198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnston, LR, Carlson, J, Hudson-Vitale, C, Imker, H, Kozlowski, W, Olendorf, R & Stewart, C 2018, 'How Important is Data Curation? Gaps and Opportunities for Academic Libraries' Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2198. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2198
Johnston, Lisa R ; Carlson, Jacob ; Hudson-Vitale, Cynthia ; Imker, Heidi ; Kozlowski, Wendy ; Olendorf, Robert ; Stewart, Claire. / How Important is Data Curation? Gaps and Opportunities for Academic Libraries. In: Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2018 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 2198.
@article{f49e4db8e0c24d349d947aca1cbf9045,
title = "How Important is Data Curation? Gaps and Opportunities for Academic Libraries",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION Data curation may be an emerging service for academic libraries, but researchers actively “curate” their data in a number of ways—even if terminology may not always align. Building on past userneeds assessments performed via survey and focus groups, the authors sought direct input from researchers on the importance and utilization of specific data curation activities. METHODS Between October 21, 2016, and November 18, 2016, the study team held focus groups with 91 participants at six different academic institutions to determine which data curation activities were most important to researchers, which activities were currently underway for their data, and how satisfied they were with the results. RESULTS Researchers are actively engaged in a variety of data curation activities, and while they considered most data curation activities to be highly important, a majority of the sample reported dissatisfaction with the current state of data curation at their institution. DISCUSSION Our findings demonstrate specific gaps and opportunities for academic libraries to focus their data curation services to more effectively meet researcher needs. CONCLUSION Research libraries stand to benefit their users by emphasizing, investing in, and/or heavily promoting the highly valued services that may not currently be in use by many researchers.",
keywords = "data curation, academic libraries, institutional repositories, researcher assessment",
author = "Johnston, {Lisa R} and Jacob Carlson and Cynthia Hudson-Vitale and Heidi Imker and Wendy Kozlowski and Robert Olendorf and Claire Stewart",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "26",
doi = "10.7710/2162-3309.2198",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "2198",
journal = "Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication",
issn = "2162-3309",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Important is Data Curation? Gaps and Opportunities for Academic Libraries

AU - Johnston, Lisa R

AU - Carlson, Jacob

AU - Hudson-Vitale, Cynthia

AU - Imker, Heidi

AU - Kozlowski, Wendy

AU - Olendorf, Robert

AU - Stewart, Claire

PY - 2018/4/26

Y1 - 2018/4/26

N2 - INTRODUCTION Data curation may be an emerging service for academic libraries, but researchers actively “curate” their data in a number of ways—even if terminology may not always align. Building on past userneeds assessments performed via survey and focus groups, the authors sought direct input from researchers on the importance and utilization of specific data curation activities. METHODS Between October 21, 2016, and November 18, 2016, the study team held focus groups with 91 participants at six different academic institutions to determine which data curation activities were most important to researchers, which activities were currently underway for their data, and how satisfied they were with the results. RESULTS Researchers are actively engaged in a variety of data curation activities, and while they considered most data curation activities to be highly important, a majority of the sample reported dissatisfaction with the current state of data curation at their institution. DISCUSSION Our findings demonstrate specific gaps and opportunities for academic libraries to focus their data curation services to more effectively meet researcher needs. CONCLUSION Research libraries stand to benefit their users by emphasizing, investing in, and/or heavily promoting the highly valued services that may not currently be in use by many researchers.

AB - INTRODUCTION Data curation may be an emerging service for academic libraries, but researchers actively “curate” their data in a number of ways—even if terminology may not always align. Building on past userneeds assessments performed via survey and focus groups, the authors sought direct input from researchers on the importance and utilization of specific data curation activities. METHODS Between October 21, 2016, and November 18, 2016, the study team held focus groups with 91 participants at six different academic institutions to determine which data curation activities were most important to researchers, which activities were currently underway for their data, and how satisfied they were with the results. RESULTS Researchers are actively engaged in a variety of data curation activities, and while they considered most data curation activities to be highly important, a majority of the sample reported dissatisfaction with the current state of data curation at their institution. DISCUSSION Our findings demonstrate specific gaps and opportunities for academic libraries to focus their data curation services to more effectively meet researcher needs. CONCLUSION Research libraries stand to benefit their users by emphasizing, investing in, and/or heavily promoting the highly valued services that may not currently be in use by many researchers.

KW - data curation

KW - academic libraries

KW - institutional repositories

KW - researcher assessment

U2 - 10.7710/2162-3309.2198

DO - 10.7710/2162-3309.2198

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 2198

JO - Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication

JF - Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication

SN - 2162-3309

IS - 1

ER -