How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences

David A. Harrison, Daniel A. Newman, Philip L. Roth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Drawing on the compatibility principle in attitude theory, we propose that overall job attitude (job satisfaction and organizational commitment) provides increasingly powerful prediction of more integrative behavioral criteria (focal performance, contextual performance, lateness, absence, and turnover combined). The principle was sustained by a combination of meta-analysis and structural equations showing better fit of unified versus diversified models of meta-analytic correlations between those criteria. Overall job attitude strongly predicted a higher-order behavioral construct, defined as desirable contributions made to one's work role (r = .59). Time-lagged data also supported this unified, attitude-engagement model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-325
Number of pages21
JournalAcademy of Management Journal
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this