TY - JOUR
T1 - How effective are community pedestrian safety training workshops? Short-term findings from a program in California
AU - Barajas, Jesus M.
AU - Beck, Kate M.
AU - Cooper, Jill F.
AU - Lopez, Ana
AU - Reynosa, Amanda
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for the CPBST program is provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Introduction: Pedestrians and bicyclists make up a disproportionate share of road deaths and injuries, and low-income, majority person-of-color communities tend to face the greatest danger. Comprehensive pedestrian safety programs targeted toward such communities have the potential to build communities’ capacity to address safety issues, but there is a lack of systematic research and evaluation on how effective these programs are. Methods: We use a mixed-methods approach of surveys, participant observation, and follow-up interviews to evaluate a community-based pedestrian and bicycle safety program in 13 California communities for its short-term effectiveness in meeting five goals: providing relevant safety information to participants, building community partnerships, increasing walking and cycling in host communities, improving perceptions of pedestrian and bicyclist safety, and planning for additional safety countermeasures. Results: Workshops have beneficial effects on identifying community needs, developing partnerships between stakeholders, and changing perceptions of safety in historically disadvantaged communities. The program improves participants’ perceptions of the role that community organizations and community events play in pedestrian safety efforts. The program also provides a critical space for community stakeholders to meet, learn a common language about safety, and develop partnerships around pedestrian and bicycle safety. Host communities have used the workshops as support for grant applications, and several have obtained funding for pedestrian and bicycle improvements. Conclusion: The workshops intervene in the short-term on multiple levels to improve pedestrian safety as described in program goals. This study provides a model for evaluating a program for its short-term effects, providing a baseline set of conditions for longer-term evaluation.
AB - Introduction: Pedestrians and bicyclists make up a disproportionate share of road deaths and injuries, and low-income, majority person-of-color communities tend to face the greatest danger. Comprehensive pedestrian safety programs targeted toward such communities have the potential to build communities’ capacity to address safety issues, but there is a lack of systematic research and evaluation on how effective these programs are. Methods: We use a mixed-methods approach of surveys, participant observation, and follow-up interviews to evaluate a community-based pedestrian and bicycle safety program in 13 California communities for its short-term effectiveness in meeting five goals: providing relevant safety information to participants, building community partnerships, increasing walking and cycling in host communities, improving perceptions of pedestrian and bicyclist safety, and planning for additional safety countermeasures. Results: Workshops have beneficial effects on identifying community needs, developing partnerships between stakeholders, and changing perceptions of safety in historically disadvantaged communities. The program improves participants’ perceptions of the role that community organizations and community events play in pedestrian safety efforts. The program also provides a critical space for community stakeholders to meet, learn a common language about safety, and develop partnerships around pedestrian and bicycle safety. Host communities have used the workshops as support for grant applications, and several have obtained funding for pedestrian and bicycle improvements. Conclusion: The workshops intervene in the short-term on multiple levels to improve pedestrian safety as described in program goals. This study provides a model for evaluating a program for its short-term effects, providing a baseline set of conditions for longer-term evaluation.
KW - Community engagement
KW - Equity
KW - Pedestrian safety
KW - Program evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060338294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060338294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jth.2019.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jth.2019.01.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060338294
SN - 2214-1405
VL - 12
SP - 183
EP - 194
JO - Journal of Transport and Health
JF - Journal of Transport and Health
ER -