How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?

Sébastien Costedoat, Esteve Corbera, Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, Jordi Honey-Rosés, Kathy Baylis, Miguel Angel Castillo-Santiago

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0119881
JournalPloS one
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 25 2015

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
Mexico
compliance
Compliance
Conservation
biodiversity
economic incentives
Aptitude
rural communities
Conservation of Natural Resources
Rural Population
Budgets
deforestation
Deforestation
Motivation
Economics
Specifications
Forests
Community Participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Cite this

Costedoat, S., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Honey-Rosés, J., Baylis, K., & Castillo-Santiago, M. A. (2015). How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? PloS one, 10(3), [e0119881]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119881

How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? / Costedoat, Sébastien; Corbera, Esteve; Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss; Honey-Rosés, Jordi; Baylis, Kathy; Castillo-Santiago, Miguel Angel.

In: PloS one, Vol. 10, No. 3, e0119881, 25.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Costedoat, S, Corbera, E, Ezzine-de-Blas, D, Honey-Rosés, J, Baylis, K & Castillo-Santiago, MA 2015, 'How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?', PloS one, vol. 10, no. 3, e0119881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119881
Costedoat S, Corbera E, Ezzine-de-Blas D, Honey-Rosés J, Baylis K, Castillo-Santiago MA. How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? PloS one. 2015 Mar 25;10(3). e0119881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119881
Costedoat, Sébastien ; Corbera, Esteve ; Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss ; Honey-Rosés, Jordi ; Baylis, Kathy ; Castillo-Santiago, Miguel Angel. / How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?. In: PloS one. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 3.
@article{25d69b978f8b42789b969069b7149957,
title = "How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?",
abstract = "We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled.",
author = "S{\'e}bastien Costedoat and Esteve Corbera and Driss Ezzine-de-Blas and Jordi Honey-Ros{\'e}s and Kathy Baylis and Castillo-Santiago, {Miguel Angel}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0119881",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?

AU - Costedoat, Sébastien

AU - Corbera, Esteve

AU - Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss

AU - Honey-Rosés, Jordi

AU - Baylis, Kathy

AU - Castillo-Santiago, Miguel Angel

PY - 2015/3/25

Y1 - 2015/3/25

N2 - We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled.

AB - We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926191088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926191088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0119881

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0119881

M3 - Article

C2 - 25807118

AN - SCOPUS:84926191088

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0119881

ER -