How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks?

Kathryn Kadous, Yuepin Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Intrinsic motivation is generally thought to be positively associated with performance on a variety of tasks. However, there is only sparse experimental evidence supporting this idea and we know little about the specific mechanisms behind any effect. We develop theory about how auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their jobs can improve their judgments about complex accounting estimates. We experimentally test whether a prompt to make auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their jobs salient improves the specific information processing behaviors necessary for high-quality judgments in complex audit tasks. It does: Prompted auditors attend to a broader set of information, process information more deeply, and request more relevant additional evidence. Supplemental analyses show that these processing behaviors mediate between salient intrinsic motivation and an improved ability to identify a biased complex estimate. Our theory and analyses indicate that auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their work provides unique value for improving judgment quality, particularly in the context of performing complex audit tasks. Our study supports the view that high-quality cognitive processing can improve auditors’ professional skepticism by providing a foundation for skeptical judgments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-131
Number of pages24
JournalContemporary Accounting Research
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Intrinsic motivation
Auditors
Audit
Auditor judgment
Professional skepticism
Information processing

Keywords

  • Intrinsic Motivation
  • Cognitive Processing
  • Complex Estimate
  • Professional Skepticism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks? / Kadous, Kathryn; Zhou, Yuepin.

In: Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.03.2019, p. 108-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4183dc9ec554bd29a6f572cb715cdc0,
title = "How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks?",
abstract = "Intrinsic motivation is generally thought to be positively associated with performance on a variety of tasks. However, there is only sparse experimental evidence supporting this idea and we know little about the specific mechanisms behind any effect. We develop theory about how auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their jobs can improve their judgments about complex accounting estimates. We experimentally test whether a prompt to make auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their jobs salient improves the specific information processing behaviors necessary for high-quality judgments in complex audit tasks. It does: Prompted auditors attend to a broader set of information, process information more deeply, and request more relevant additional evidence. Supplemental analyses show that these processing behaviors mediate between salient intrinsic motivation and an improved ability to identify a biased complex estimate. Our theory and analyses indicate that auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their work provides unique value for improving judgment quality, particularly in the context of performing complex audit tasks. Our study supports the view that high-quality cognitive processing can improve auditors’ professional skepticism by providing a foundation for skeptical judgments.",
keywords = "Intrinsic Motivation, Cognitive Processing, Complex Estimate, Professional Skepticism",
author = "Kathryn Kadous and Yuepin Zhou",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1911-3846.12431",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "108--131",
journal = "Contemporary Accounting Research",
issn = "0823-9150",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks?

AU - Kadous, Kathryn

AU - Zhou, Yuepin

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Intrinsic motivation is generally thought to be positively associated with performance on a variety of tasks. However, there is only sparse experimental evidence supporting this idea and we know little about the specific mechanisms behind any effect. We develop theory about how auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their jobs can improve their judgments about complex accounting estimates. We experimentally test whether a prompt to make auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their jobs salient improves the specific information processing behaviors necessary for high-quality judgments in complex audit tasks. It does: Prompted auditors attend to a broader set of information, process information more deeply, and request more relevant additional evidence. Supplemental analyses show that these processing behaviors mediate between salient intrinsic motivation and an improved ability to identify a biased complex estimate. Our theory and analyses indicate that auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their work provides unique value for improving judgment quality, particularly in the context of performing complex audit tasks. Our study supports the view that high-quality cognitive processing can improve auditors’ professional skepticism by providing a foundation for skeptical judgments.

AB - Intrinsic motivation is generally thought to be positively associated with performance on a variety of tasks. However, there is only sparse experimental evidence supporting this idea and we know little about the specific mechanisms behind any effect. We develop theory about how auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their jobs can improve their judgments about complex accounting estimates. We experimentally test whether a prompt to make auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their jobs salient improves the specific information processing behaviors necessary for high-quality judgments in complex audit tasks. It does: Prompted auditors attend to a broader set of information, process information more deeply, and request more relevant additional evidence. Supplemental analyses show that these processing behaviors mediate between salient intrinsic motivation and an improved ability to identify a biased complex estimate. Our theory and analyses indicate that auditors’ intrinsic motivation for their work provides unique value for improving judgment quality, particularly in the context of performing complex audit tasks. Our study supports the view that high-quality cognitive processing can improve auditors’ professional skepticism by providing a foundation for skeptical judgments.

KW - Intrinsic Motivation

KW - Cognitive Processing

KW - Complex Estimate

KW - Professional Skepticism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058385628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058385628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1911-3846.12431

DO - 10.1111/1911-3846.12431

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 108

EP - 131

JO - Contemporary Accounting Research

JF - Contemporary Accounting Research

SN - 0823-9150

IS - 1

ER -