TY - JOUR
T1 - How do the object-file and physical-reasoning systems interact?
T2 - Evidence from priming effects with object arrays or novel labels
AU - Lin, Yi
AU - Li, Jie
AU - Gertner, Yael
AU - Ng, Weiting
AU - Fisher, Cynthia L
AU - Baillargeon, Renée
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from NICHD to R.B. (HD-021104) and by grants from NICHD (HD-054448) and NSF (BCS-1348522) to C.L.F. We thank Lin Bian and Sandy Waxman for helpful comments and suggestions; the UIUC Infant Cognition Lab for their help with the data collection; Steve Holland for his help with the figures; Am?lie Bernard for her help with the design and implementation of Experiment 6; and the families who participated in the research.
Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from NICHD to R.B. (HD-021104) and by grants from NICHD (HD-054448) and NSF (BCS-1348522) to C.L.F. We thank Lin Bian and Sandy Waxman for helpful comments and suggestions; the UIUC Infant Cognition Lab for their help with the data collection; Steve Holland for his help with the figures; Amélie Bernard for her help with the design and implementation of Experiment 6; and the families who participated in the research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - How do infants reason about simple physical events such as containment, tube, and support events? According to the two-system model, two cognitive systems, the object-file (OF) and physical-reasoning (PR) systems, work together to guide infants' responses to these events. When an event begins, the OF system sends categorical information about the objects and their arrangements to the PR system. This system then categorizes the event, assigns event roles to the objects, and taps the OF system for information about features previously identified as causally relevant for the event category selected. All of the categorical and featural information included in the event's representation is interpreted by the PR system's domain knowledge, which includes core principles such as persistence and gravity. The present research tested a novel prediction of the model: If the OF system could be primed to also send, at the beginning of an event, information about an as-yet-unidentified feature, the PR system would then interpret this information using its core principles, allowing infants to detect core violations involving the feature earlier than they normally would. We examined this prediction using two types of priming manipulations directed at the OF system, object arrays and novel labels. In six experiments, infants aged 7-13 months (N = 304) were tested using different event categories and as-yet-unidentified features (color in containment events, height in tube events, and proportional distribution in support events) as well as different tasks (violation-of-expectation and action tasks). In each case, infants who were effectively primed reasoned successfully about the as-yet-unidentified feature, sometimes as early as six months before they would typically do so. These converging results provide strong support for the two-system model and for the claim that uncovering how the OF and PR systems represent and exchange information is essential for understanding how infants respond to physical events.
AB - How do infants reason about simple physical events such as containment, tube, and support events? According to the two-system model, two cognitive systems, the object-file (OF) and physical-reasoning (PR) systems, work together to guide infants' responses to these events. When an event begins, the OF system sends categorical information about the objects and their arrangements to the PR system. This system then categorizes the event, assigns event roles to the objects, and taps the OF system for information about features previously identified as causally relevant for the event category selected. All of the categorical and featural information included in the event's representation is interpreted by the PR system's domain knowledge, which includes core principles such as persistence and gravity. The present research tested a novel prediction of the model: If the OF system could be primed to also send, at the beginning of an event, information about an as-yet-unidentified feature, the PR system would then interpret this information using its core principles, allowing infants to detect core violations involving the feature earlier than they normally would. We examined this prediction using two types of priming manipulations directed at the OF system, object arrays and novel labels. In six experiments, infants aged 7-13 months (N = 304) were tested using different event categories and as-yet-unidentified features (color in containment events, height in tube events, and proportional distribution in support events) as well as different tasks (violation-of-expectation and action tasks). In each case, infants who were effectively primed reasoned successfully about the as-yet-unidentified feature, sometimes as early as six months before they would typically do so. These converging results provide strong support for the two-system model and for the claim that uncovering how the OF and PR systems represent and exchange information is essential for understanding how infants respond to physical events.
KW - Event representation
KW - Infant cognition
KW - Object-file system
KW - Physical reasoning
KW - Physical-reasoning system
KW - Priming
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098934957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098934957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101368
DO - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101368
M3 - Article
C2 - 33421683
SN - 0010-0285
VL - 125
JO - Cognitive Psychology
JF - Cognitive Psychology
M1 - 101368
ER -