TY - JOUR
T1 - How Do Explicit and Implicit Evaluations Shift? A Preregistered Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Co-Occurrence and Relational Information
AU - Kurdi, Benedek
AU - Morehouse, Kirsten N.
AU - Dunham, Yarrow
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Patrick Mair for his generous and extremely helpful advice on statistical issues and the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology for a prior rejection. The authors also thank the following authors who shared effect sizes or raw data with them and thereby helped ensure that the estimates emerging from this meta-analysis are more accurate: Jeremy Cone, Jan De Houwer, Roland Deutsch, Anne Gast, Bertram Gawronski, Luke Green, Xiaoqing Hu, Sean Hughes, Yong Jae Ko, Nicolas Koranyi, Camilla Luck, Tal Moran, Steven Sweldens, and Christian Unkelbach.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Psychological Association
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Based on 660 effect sizes obtained from 23, 255 adult participants across 51 reports of experimental studies, this meta-analysis investigates whether and when explicit (self-reported) and implicit (indirectly revealed) evaluations reflect relational information (how stimuli are related to each other) over and above cooccurrence information (the fact that stimuli have been paired with each other). Using a mixed-effects metaregression, relational information was found to dominate over contradictory co-occurrence information in shifting both explicit (mean Hedges’ g = 0.97, 95% CI [0.89, 1.05], 95% PI [0.24, 1.70]) and implicit evaluations (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.19, 0.35], 95% PI [−0.46, 1.00]). However, considerable heterogeneity in relational effects on implicit evaluation made moderator analyses necessary. Implicit evaluations were particularly sensitive to relational information (a) in between-participant (rather than within-participant) designs; when (b) co-occurrence information was held constant (rather than manipulated); (c) targets were novel (rather than known); implicit evaluations were measured (d) first (rather than last) and (e) using an affect misattribution procedure (rather than an Implicit Association Test or evaluative priming task); and (f) relational and co-occurrence information were presented in temporal proximity (rather than far apart in time). Overall, the present findings suggest that both implicit and explicit evaluations emerge from a combination of co-occurrence information and relational information, with relational information usually playing the dominant role. Critically, variability in these effects highlights a need to refocus attention from existence proof demonstrations toward theoretical and empirical work on the determinants and boundary conditions of the influences of co-occurrence and relational information on explicit and implicit evaluations.
AB - Based on 660 effect sizes obtained from 23, 255 adult participants across 51 reports of experimental studies, this meta-analysis investigates whether and when explicit (self-reported) and implicit (indirectly revealed) evaluations reflect relational information (how stimuli are related to each other) over and above cooccurrence information (the fact that stimuli have been paired with each other). Using a mixed-effects metaregression, relational information was found to dominate over contradictory co-occurrence information in shifting both explicit (mean Hedges’ g = 0.97, 95% CI [0.89, 1.05], 95% PI [0.24, 1.70]) and implicit evaluations (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.19, 0.35], 95% PI [−0.46, 1.00]). However, considerable heterogeneity in relational effects on implicit evaluation made moderator analyses necessary. Implicit evaluations were particularly sensitive to relational information (a) in between-participant (rather than within-participant) designs; when (b) co-occurrence information was held constant (rather than manipulated); (c) targets were novel (rather than known); implicit evaluations were measured (d) first (rather than last) and (e) using an affect misattribution procedure (rather than an Implicit Association Test or evaluative priming task); and (f) relational and co-occurrence information were presented in temporal proximity (rather than far apart in time). Overall, the present findings suggest that both implicit and explicit evaluations emerge from a combination of co-occurrence information and relational information, with relational information usually playing the dominant role. Critically, variability in these effects highlights a need to refocus attention from existence proof demonstrations toward theoretical and empirical work on the determinants and boundary conditions of the influences of co-occurrence and relational information on explicit and implicit evaluations.
KW - Associative theories
KW - Attitudes
KW - Implicit evaluations
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Propositional theories
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145829984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85145829984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/pspa0000329
DO - 10.1037/pspa0000329
M3 - Article
C2 - 36442026
AN - SCOPUS:85145829984
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 124
SP - 1174
EP - 1202
JO - Journal of personality and social psychology
JF - Journal of personality and social psychology
IS - 6
ER -