How Atypical Cases Make Bad Rules: A Commentary on the Rulemaking Process

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number5
Pages (from-to)1141-1160
JournalNevada Law Journal
Volume15
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Discovery
  • advisory committee
  • rules
  • rules enabling act
  • rulemaking
  • amendments
  • proportional
  • proportionality
  • 26(b)(1)

Cite this

How Atypical Cases Make Bad Rules : A Commentary on the Rulemaking Process. / Thomas, Suja A.

In: Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, 5, 2015, p. 1141-1160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{190d25d03e28437d82629329a6c50084,
title = "How Atypical Cases Make Bad Rules: A Commentary on the Rulemaking Process",
keywords = "Discovery, advisory committee, rules, rules enabling act, rulemaking, amendments, proportional, proportionality, 26(b)(1)",
author = "Thomas, {Suja A}",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1141--1160",
journal = "Nevada Law Journal",
issn = "2157-1899",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Atypical Cases Make Bad Rules

T2 - A Commentary on the Rulemaking Process

AU - Thomas, Suja A

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

KW - Discovery

KW - advisory committee

KW - rules

KW - rules enabling act

KW - rulemaking

KW - amendments

KW - proportional

KW - proportionality

KW - 26(b)(1)

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1141

EP - 1160

JO - Nevada Law Journal

JF - Nevada Law Journal

SN - 2157-1899

IS - 3

M1 - 5

ER -