TY - JOUR
T1 - Home screening of taste and oral trigeminal function
T2 - a feasibility study
AU - Green, Tomer
AU - Mastinu, Mariano
AU - Wolf, Anne
AU - Oleszkiewicz, Anna
AU - Aronis, Anna
AU - Hummel, Thomas
AU - Pepino, M. Yanina
AU - Niv, Masha Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Purpose: gustatory ability is a marker of health not routinely tested in the medical practice. The current study wants to assess whether taste strips can be useful to monitor taste function from home. Methods: we performed simple sensory tests in lab setting vs. unassisted testing at home, and compared the results with self-reports ability to taste and smell. Using paper strips impregnated with sweet, bitter, salty, or sour tastants, and with two trigeminal stimuli (capsaicin, tannins) in high and low concentrations, we assessed gustatory and trigeminal function in 74 participants (47 women) in the lab, where paper strips were administered by an experimenter, and in 77 participants (59 women) at home, where they self-administered the test. Results: we found that high (but not low) concentration taste strips are correctly identified by vast majority of participants. On average, taste identification, intensity and pleasantness scores did not differ for the 8 taste strips, while identification of capsaicin was significantly better in the lab. Taste identification scores correlated with intensity ratings in both settings (r = 0.56, in the lab, r = 0.48, at home, p < 0.005). Self-rated taste ability correlated with self-rated smell ability (r = 0.68, and r = 0.39, p ≤ 0.005), but not with scores in the strips test. Conclusion: home testing with impregnated taste strips is feasible, and can be used for telemedical purposes.
AB - Purpose: gustatory ability is a marker of health not routinely tested in the medical practice. The current study wants to assess whether taste strips can be useful to monitor taste function from home. Methods: we performed simple sensory tests in lab setting vs. unassisted testing at home, and compared the results with self-reports ability to taste and smell. Using paper strips impregnated with sweet, bitter, salty, or sour tastants, and with two trigeminal stimuli (capsaicin, tannins) in high and low concentrations, we assessed gustatory and trigeminal function in 74 participants (47 women) in the lab, where paper strips were administered by an experimenter, and in 77 participants (59 women) at home, where they self-administered the test. Results: we found that high (but not low) concentration taste strips are correctly identified by vast majority of participants. On average, taste identification, intensity and pleasantness scores did not differ for the 8 taste strips, while identification of capsaicin was significantly better in the lab. Taste identification scores correlated with intensity ratings in both settings (r = 0.56, in the lab, r = 0.48, at home, p < 0.005). Self-rated taste ability correlated with self-rated smell ability (r = 0.68, and r = 0.39, p ≤ 0.005), but not with scores in the strips test. Conclusion: home testing with impregnated taste strips is feasible, and can be used for telemedical purposes.
KW - Gustatory assessment
KW - Sensory tests
KW - Seven-iTT
KW - Subjective
KW - Taste strips
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190800382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85190800382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00405-024-08654-5
DO - 10.1007/s00405-024-08654-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 38630275
AN - SCOPUS:85190800382
SN - 0937-4477
VL - 281
SP - 4835
EP - 4844
JO - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
JF - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
IS - 9
ER -