Historians and the Study of Protest

Brian Dill, Ronald Aminzade

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we reflect on the distinctive ways in which historians have contributed to our understanding of social movements and collective action. We find that historians interrogate the historical record in at least one of three ways. First, historians characterize their task as interpretative; that is, they attempt to establish not only the “actuality” of an event by constructing a textual account of it, but also its meaning by providing a detailed description of its causes, scope, and outcomes, as well as of the parties involved, their motives, and their accomplishments. A second approach is expansive. Scholars working in this vein seek to augment the historical record with respect to established events, legitimating their particular contribution to the literature by showing how it fills a gap or omission. Third, historians of social movements and collective action portray their narrative accounts of particular events as corrective. This often involves providing an interpretation that challenges the official or established view of an event.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines
EditorsConny Roggeband, Bert Klandermans
PublisherSpringer
Chapter6
Pages141-183
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-57648-0
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-57647-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Publication series

NameHandbooks of Sociology and Social Research

Fingerprint

Protest
Historian
Social Movements
Historical Records
Collective Action
Actuality
Omission
Accomplishment
Causes

Keywords

  • historians
  • social movements
  • core concepts
  • interpretive
  • expansive
  • corrective
  • disciplinary boundaries

Cite this

Dill, B., & Aminzade, R. (2017). Historians and the Study of Protest. In C. Roggeband, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines (pp. 141-183). (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57648-0_6

Historians and the Study of Protest. / Dill, Brian; Aminzade, Ronald.

Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines. ed. / Conny Roggeband; Bert Klandermans. Springer, 2017. p. 141-183 (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Dill, B & Aminzade, R 2017, Historians and the Study of Protest. in C Roggeband & B Klandermans (eds), Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, Springer, pp. 141-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57648-0_6
Dill B, Aminzade R. Historians and the Study of Protest. In Roggeband C, Klandermans B, editors, Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines. Springer. 2017. p. 141-183. (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57648-0_6
Dill, Brian ; Aminzade, Ronald. / Historians and the Study of Protest. Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines. editor / Conny Roggeband ; Bert Klandermans. Springer, 2017. pp. 141-183 (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research).
@inbook{a9005f1ede2a4cd4a60f8a014bad3aae,
title = "Historians and the Study of Protest",
abstract = "In this chapter, we reflect on the distinctive ways in which historians have contributed to our understanding of social movements and collective action. We find that historians interrogate the historical record in at least one of three ways. First, historians characterize their task as interpretative; that is, they attempt to establish not only the “actuality” of an event by constructing a textual account of it, but also its meaning by providing a detailed description of its causes, scope, and outcomes, as well as of the parties involved, their motives, and their accomplishments. A second approach is expansive. Scholars working in this vein seek to augment the historical record with respect to established events, legitimating their particular contribution to the literature by showing how it fills a gap or omission. Third, historians of social movements and collective action portray their narrative accounts of particular events as corrective. This often involves providing an interpretation that challenges the official or established view of an event.",
keywords = "historians, social movements, core concepts, interpretive, expansive, corrective, disciplinary boundaries",
author = "Brian Dill and Ronald Aminzade",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-57648-0_6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "978-3-319-57647-3",
series = "Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "141--183",
editor = "Conny Roggeband and Bert Klandermans",
booktitle = "Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Historians and the Study of Protest

AU - Dill, Brian

AU - Aminzade, Ronald

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - In this chapter, we reflect on the distinctive ways in which historians have contributed to our understanding of social movements and collective action. We find that historians interrogate the historical record in at least one of three ways. First, historians characterize their task as interpretative; that is, they attempt to establish not only the “actuality” of an event by constructing a textual account of it, but also its meaning by providing a detailed description of its causes, scope, and outcomes, as well as of the parties involved, their motives, and their accomplishments. A second approach is expansive. Scholars working in this vein seek to augment the historical record with respect to established events, legitimating their particular contribution to the literature by showing how it fills a gap or omission. Third, historians of social movements and collective action portray their narrative accounts of particular events as corrective. This often involves providing an interpretation that challenges the official or established view of an event.

AB - In this chapter, we reflect on the distinctive ways in which historians have contributed to our understanding of social movements and collective action. We find that historians interrogate the historical record in at least one of three ways. First, historians characterize their task as interpretative; that is, they attempt to establish not only the “actuality” of an event by constructing a textual account of it, but also its meaning by providing a detailed description of its causes, scope, and outcomes, as well as of the parties involved, their motives, and their accomplishments. A second approach is expansive. Scholars working in this vein seek to augment the historical record with respect to established events, legitimating their particular contribution to the literature by showing how it fills a gap or omission. Third, historians of social movements and collective action portray their narrative accounts of particular events as corrective. This often involves providing an interpretation that challenges the official or established view of an event.

KW - historians

KW - social movements

KW - core concepts

KW - interpretive

KW - expansive

KW - corrective

KW - disciplinary boundaries

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-57648-0_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-57648-0_6

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-57647-3

T3 - Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research

SP - 141

EP - 183

BT - Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines

A2 - Roggeband, Conny

A2 - Klandermans, Bert

PB - Springer

ER -